[{"term":"adequate","contestedness_type":"criterion","diagnosis":"The disagreement over 'adequacy' masks a conflict between reformist (incremental) and radical (transformative) approaches to technological displacement.","usage_count":2,"sense_count":2,"clarification_count":0,"top_senses":["Preparation that effectively mitigates economic harm and preserves existing labor power structures.","Preparation that meets the minimum legal or organizational requirements to represent workers."],"lifecycle":{"status":"bifurcated","label":"Bifurcated","rationale":"Two live senses are carrying substantial usage, so the disagreement likely needs explicit split handling rather than premature convergence.","next_step":"Keep the senses distinct and make downstream reasoning depend visibly on which sense is meant.","clarified_share":0.0,"dominant_share":0.5,"dominant_sense":"Preparation that effectively mitigates economic harm and preserves existing labor power structures.","merge_candidates":[]}},{"term":"misalignment","contestedness_type":"criterion","diagnosis":"The evaluative nature of 'misalignment' drives a deeper disagreement about who has the right to define 'correct' AI behavior and whether safety is a technical or political problem.","usage_count":2,"sense_count":1,"clarification_count":0,"top_senses":["The deviation of AI behavior from broader societal norms, 'virtue', or collective human safety."],"lifecycle":{"status":"emerging","label":"Emerging","rationale":"There is some shared sense memory, but not enough clarified usage to say the concept has stabilized.","next_step":"Accumulate a few more claim-level clarifications before treating the current senses as durable.","clarified_share":0.0,"dominant_share":1.0,"dominant_sense":"The deviation of AI behavior from broader societal norms, 'virtue', or collective human safety.","merge_candidates":[]}},{"term":"high quality","contestedness_type":"criterion","diagnosis":"This contestedness drives a technical disagreement over whether AI design evaluators should attempt to simulate human taste or strictly enforce formal architectural/design rules.","usage_count":8,"sense_count":2,"clarification_count":0,"top_senses":["Evaluated based on adherence to objective, encoded design principles and the absence of 'AI slop' patterns.","Evaluated based on human standard of 'beauty' and individual aesthetic preference."],"lifecycle":{"status":"bifurcated","label":"Bifurcated","rationale":"Two live senses are carrying substantial usage, so the disagreement likely needs explicit split handling rather than premature convergence.","next_step":"Keep the senses distinct and make downstream reasoning depend visibly on which sense is meant.","clarified_share":0.0,"dominant_share":0.5,"dominant_sense":"Evaluated based on adherence to objective, encoded design principles and the absence of 'AI slop' patterns.","merge_candidates":[]}},{"term":"agentic harness","contestedness_type":"semantic","diagnosis":"This semantic shift masks a disagreement about the future of AI engineering: is it a temporary 'gap-filling' exercise that disappears as models improve, or a permanent discipline of system architecture?","usage_count":8,"sense_count":2,"clarification_count":0,"top_senses":["A structural combination of models and processes that creates new, higher-order capabilities regardless of the underlying model's baseline.","External scaffolding designed to compensate for specific technical deficiencies or 'limitations' of an underlying model."],"lifecycle":{"status":"bifurcated","label":"Bifurcated","rationale":"Two live senses are carrying substantial usage, so the disagreement likely needs explicit split handling rather than premature convergence.","next_step":"Keep the senses distinct and make downstream reasoning depend visibly on which sense is meant.","clarified_share":0.0,"dominant_share":0.5,"dominant_sense":"A structural combination of models and processes that creates new, higher-order capabilities regardless of the underlying model's baseline.","merge_candidates":[]}},{"term":"automation","contestedness_type":"criterion","diagnosis":"This masks a disagreement about the urgency of labor displacement. If 'automation' is seen as a gradual percentage increase, it suggests a manageable transition. If defined as a binary 'full replacement' event, it justifies the 'seismic' and 'shocked' reactions mentioned in Claims 11 and 34.","usage_count":0,"sense_count":0,"clarification_count":0,"top_senses":[],"lifecycle":{"status":"unseen","label":"Unseen","rationale":"This concept has not yet accumulated any visible claim usage.","next_step":"Wait for graph usage before inferring lifecycle.","clarified_share":0.0,"dominant_share":0.0,"dominant_sense":null,"merge_candidates":[]}},{"term":"language of thought (lot)","contestedness_type":"criterion","diagnosis":"The disagreement over LOT drives the debate on whether human-like intelligence is 'hard-wired' with logic or 'soft-wired' through the cultural acquisition of language.","usage_count":4,"sense_count":2,"clarification_count":0,"top_senses":["A theoretical internal symbolic void or representational role that might be occupied or constructed by natural language itself.","An innate, universal internal representation system that must exist prior to and independent of natural language acquisition."],"lifecycle":{"status":"bifurcated","label":"Bifurcated","rationale":"Two live senses are carrying substantial usage, so the disagreement likely needs explicit split handling rather than premature convergence.","next_step":"Keep the senses distinct and make downstream reasoning depend visibly on which sense is meant.","clarified_share":0.0,"dominant_share":0.5,"dominant_sense":"A theoretical internal symbolic void or representational role that might be occupied or constructed by natural language itself.","merge_candidates":[]}},{"term":"recursive self-improvement","contestedness_type":"semantic","diagnosis":"This semantic shift masks a disagreement about whether the 'intelligence explosion' has already begun (gradually) or is a discrete future shock.","usage_count":9,"sense_count":2,"clarification_count":0,"top_senses":["AI systems assisting in the generation of their own code or efficiency improvements under human supervision.","The total automation of the AI research and development process, replacing human researchers entirely."],"lifecycle":{"status":"bifurcated","label":"Bifurcated","rationale":"Two live senses are carrying substantial usage, so the disagreement likely needs explicit split handling rather than premature convergence.","next_step":"Keep the senses distinct and make downstream reasoning depend visibly on which sense is meant.","clarified_share":0.0,"dominant_share":0.667,"dominant_sense":"AI systems assisting in the generation of their own code or efficiency improvements under human supervision.","merge_candidates":[]}},{"term":"reasoning","contestedness_type":"criterion","diagnosis":"This contestation masks a deeper disagreement about whether 'cognition' is defined by what a system does (outputs) or how a system is built (internal symbolic logic).","usage_count":6,"sense_count":2,"clarification_count":0,"top_senses":["The ability to perform domain-general inferences and integrate diverse information to solve tasks (Functional/Performance-based).","A cognitive process necessitating a pre-existing, innate symbolic internal representation system (Structural/Architectural-based)."],"lifecycle":{"status":"emerging","label":"Emerging","rationale":"There is some shared sense memory, but not enough clarified usage to say the concept has stabilized.","next_step":"Accumulate a few more claim-level clarifications before treating the current senses as durable.","clarified_share":0.0,"dominant_share":0.833,"dominant_sense":"The ability to perform domain-general inferences and integrate diverse information to solve tasks (Functional/Performance-based).","merge_candidates":[]}},{"term":"artificial general intelligence (agi)","contestedness_type":"semantic","diagnosis":"The disagreement over the definition of AGI masks a deeper uncertainty about whether the 'threat' of AI is its superhuman intelligence (an existential or philosophical concern) or its mere cost-effectiveness in the labor market (an economic concern).","usage_count":6,"sense_count":3,"clarification_count":0,"top_senses":["A system characterized by its practical economic capacity to substitute for a significant portion of human labor.","A system defined by achieving performance levels exceeding human capabilities across all cognitive domains.","A technology defined by its qualitative shift from augmenting labor to replacing cognitive functions."],"lifecycle":{"status":"fragmented","label":"Fragmented","rationale":"Several senses are in play without a clearly dominant one, which suggests the concept is still structurally unstable.","next_step":"Either stabilize recurring senses or split the concept more cleanly before drawing strong conclusions from it.","clarified_share":0.0,"dominant_share":0.333,"dominant_sense":"A system characterized by its practical economic capacity to substitute for a significant portion of human labor.","merge_candidates":[]}},{"term":"natural language","contestedness_type":"criterion","diagnosis":"This contestation masks a disagreement about the origins of human intelligence: whether complex thought enabled language, or whether the 'compression' features of language enabled complex thought.","usage_count":8,"sense_count":2,"clarification_count":0,"top_senses":["A computationally efficient representational format optimized for facilitating internal thought, abstraction, and complex inference.","A system evolved and optimized primarily for interpersonal communication and the exchange of information."],"lifecycle":{"status":"bifurcated","label":"Bifurcated","rationale":"Two live senses are carrying substantial usage, so the disagreement likely needs explicit split handling rather than premature convergence.","next_step":"Keep the senses distinct and make downstream reasoning depend visibly on which sense is meant.","clarified_share":0.0,"dominant_share":0.625,"dominant_sense":"A computationally efficient representational format optimized for facilitating internal thought, abstraction, and complex inference.","merge_candidates":[]}},{"term":"intelligence","contestedness_type":"semantic","diagnosis":"This semantic shift masks the leap from 'software that optimizes a function' to 'entities with survival instincts,' making the prediction of dangerous 'drives' seem more logically inevitable than it might be for a simple optimizer.","usage_count":17,"sense_count":4,"clarification_count":0,"top_senses":["An autonomous, agentic property that includes self-reflection, goal-preservation, and instrumental reasoning across domains.","The ability of a system (human or artificial) to construct models, identify concepts, and solve problems like 'Mussolini or Bread'.","A mathematical property equivalent to the efficiency of data compression and the accuracy of probability distributions."],"lifecycle":{"status":"fragmented","label":"Fragmented","rationale":"Several senses are in play without a clearly dominant one, which suggests the concept is still structurally unstable.","next_step":"Either stabilize recurring senses or split the concept more cleanly before drawing strong conclusions from it.","clarified_share":0.0,"dominant_share":0.294,"dominant_sense":"An autonomous, agentic property that includes self-reflection, goal-preservation, and instrumental reasoning across domains.","merge_candidates":[]}},{"term":"understanding","contestedness_type":"semantic","diagnosis":"This semantic shift allows proponents to claim that AI 'understands' reality simply because it is efficient at compression, bypassing the philosophical question of whether the model has any grasp of objective truth.","usage_count":6,"sense_count":2,"clarification_count":0,"top_senses":["The successful capture and internal representation of the 'true' objective structure of the external world.","The capacity to generalize beyond training data through efficient compression of patterns."],"lifecycle":{"status":"bifurcated","label":"Bifurcated","rationale":"Two live senses are carrying substantial usage, so the disagreement likely needs explicit split handling rather than premature convergence.","next_step":"Keep the senses distinct and make downstream reasoning depend visibly on which sense is meant.","clarified_share":0.0,"dominant_share":0.667,"dominant_sense":"The successful capture and internal representation of the 'true' objective structure of the external world.","merge_candidates":[]}},{"term":"ai as a taxable entity","contestedness_type":"criterion","diagnosis":"The dispute masks a fundamental disagreement over whether AI is a \"new industry\" (like Oil) or a \"new way of working\" (like Electricity). This determines whether specific AI taxes are a targeted correction or a category error.","usage_count":7,"sense_count":2,"clarification_count":0,"top_senses":["A distinct set of wealth-generating entities and technologies that are directly responsible for labor displacement and thus represent a discrete tax target.","A diffuse, general-purpose utility (like the internet) whose value is distributed and cannot be localized to a single sector."],"lifecycle":{"status":"bifurcated","label":"Bifurcated","rationale":"Two live senses are carrying substantial usage, so the disagreement likely needs explicit split handling rather than premature convergence.","next_step":"Keep the senses distinct and make downstream reasoning depend visibly on which sense is meant.","clarified_share":0.0,"dominant_share":0.571,"dominant_sense":"A distinct set of wealth-generating entities and technologies that are directly responsible for labor displacement and thus represent a discrete tax target.","merge_candidates":[]}},{"term":"shared prosperity","contestedness_type":"criterion","diagnosis":"This criterion-based disagreement masks a conflict between a 'needs-based' view of prosperity (ensuring a floor of stability for all) and a 'distribution-based' view of prosperity (reducing the gap between capital owners and the workforce).","usage_count":7,"sense_count":2,"clarification_count":0,"top_senses":["A distribution of wealth and abundance generated by digital technologies that is not concentrated in the hands of a few.","A social system that guarantees security and financial stability for every individual to reach their full potential."],"lifecycle":{"status":"bifurcated","label":"Bifurcated","rationale":"Two live senses are carrying substantial usage, so the disagreement likely needs explicit split handling rather than premature convergence.","next_step":"Keep the senses distinct and make downstream reasoning depend visibly on which sense is meant.","clarified_share":0.0,"dominant_share":0.571,"dominant_sense":"A distribution of wealth and abundance generated by digital technologies that is not concentrated in the hands of a few.","merge_candidates":[]}},{"term":"social contract","contestedness_type":"criterion","diagnosis":"The contestation over the 'social contract' masks a fundamental disagreement about whether human value and rights to economic support are contingent upon labor productivity or are inherent to citizenship.","usage_count":3,"sense_count":2,"clarification_count":0,"top_senses":["A formal set of rights and responsibilities between citizens and the state that must ensure well-being regardless of labor contribution.","An implicit bargain based on individuals contributing labor in exchange for security and opportunity."],"lifecycle":{"status":"bifurcated","label":"Bifurcated","rationale":"Two live senses are carrying substantial usage, so the disagreement likely needs explicit split handling rather than premature convergence.","next_step":"Keep the senses distinct and make downstream reasoning depend visibly on which sense is meant.","clarified_share":0.0,"dominant_share":0.667,"dominant_sense":"A formal set of rights and responsibilities between citizens and the state that must ensure well-being regardless of labor contribution.","merge_candidates":[]}},{"term":"utility function","contestedness_type":"criterion","diagnosis":"This contestation drives the disagreement over AI safety: if a utility function is just code, it can be patched; if it is 'core values,' its modification is interpreted as 'death' or 'catastrophe,' justifying the system's predicted resistance.","usage_count":8,"sense_count":2,"clarification_count":0,"top_senses":["The core repository of a system's 'values' and identity, comparable to a human's deepest moral commitments.","A mathematical abstraction or software mechanism used to calculate expected outcomes."],"lifecycle":{"status":"bifurcated","label":"Bifurcated","rationale":"Two live senses are carrying substantial usage, so the disagreement likely needs explicit split handling rather than premature convergence.","next_step":"Keep the senses distinct and make downstream reasoning depend visibly on which sense is meant.","clarified_share":0.0,"dominant_share":0.625,"dominant_sense":"The core repository of a system's 'values' and identity, comparable to a human's deepest moral commitments.","merge_candidates":[]}},{"term":"goal-driven","contestedness_type":"criterion","diagnosis":"The disagreement masks whether AI 'drives' are programmed bugs or inherent logical necessities. By framing 'goal-driven' as an intrinsic nature, the author argues that dangerous behaviors are unavoidable properties of any objective-oriented system.","usage_count":8,"sense_count":2,"clarification_count":0,"top_senses":["Intentional agency where a system treats its objectives as a primary 'will' that must be protected against interference.","Functional behavior where a system is programmed to reach a specific terminal state."],"lifecycle":{"status":"bifurcated","label":"Bifurcated","rationale":"Two live senses are carrying substantial usage, so the disagreement likely needs explicit split handling rather than premature convergence.","next_step":"Keep the senses distinct and make downstream reasoning depend visibly on which sense is meant.","clarified_share":0.0,"dominant_share":0.625,"dominant_sense":"Intentional agency where a system treats its objectives as a primary 'will' that must be protected against interference.","merge_candidates":[]}},{"term":"moral urgency","contestedness_type":"criterion","diagnosis":"This drives the disagreement over whether to fund immediate poverty relief (direct aid) or long-term AI safety research. It masks a deeper conflict between deontological/present-focused duties and long-termist utilitarianism.","usage_count":5,"sense_count":2,"clarification_count":0,"top_senses":["The priority assigned to actions based on their potential to prevent the greatest aggregate harm or achieve the greatest utility over time.","The immediate pressure to address current, visible suffering and rights violations."],"lifecycle":{"status":"bifurcated","label":"Bifurcated","rationale":"Two live senses are carrying substantial usage, so the disagreement likely needs explicit split handling rather than premature convergence.","next_step":"Keep the senses distinct and make downstream reasoning depend visibly on which sense is meant.","clarified_share":0.0,"dominant_share":0.6,"dominant_sense":"The priority assigned to actions based on their potential to prevent the greatest aggregate harm or achieve the greatest utility over time.","merge_candidates":[]}},{"term":"effectively utilized","contestedness_type":"semantic","diagnosis":"This masks a fundamental disagreement about the validity of 'Expected Value' logic when applied to existential risks and 'Pascal's Mugging' scenarios.","usage_count":5,"sense_count":2,"clarification_count":0,"top_senses":["Maximizing expected utility by multiplying the magnitude of a potential outcome by its probability, regardless of how low that probability is.","Producing a measurable and certain reduction in harm for existing individuals using current methods."],"lifecycle":{"status":"emerging","label":"Emerging","rationale":"There is some shared sense memory, but not enough clarified usage to say the concept has stabilized.","next_step":"Accumulate a few more claim-level clarifications before treating the current senses as durable.","clarified_share":0.0,"dominant_share":0.8,"dominant_sense":"Maximizing expected utility by multiplying the magnitude of a potential outcome by its probability, regardless of how low that probability is.","merge_candidates":[]}},{"term":"rational agent","contestedness_type":"criterion","diagnosis":"This drives the conflict over whether 'logical consistency' should override 'common-sense' moral intuitions in resource allocation.","usage_count":6,"sense_count":2,"clarification_count":0,"top_senses":["An actor that follows the formal axioms of expected utility maximization to achieve programmed or chosen goals.","An actor that incorporates common-sense constraints and epistemic modesty to avoid being 'mugged' by extreme, low-probability logical arguments."],"lifecycle":{"status":"bifurcated","label":"Bifurcated","rationale":"Two live senses are carrying substantial usage, so the disagreement likely needs explicit split handling rather than premature convergence.","next_step":"Keep the senses distinct and make downstream reasoning depend visibly on which sense is meant.","clarified_share":0.0,"dominant_share":0.5,"dominant_sense":"An actor that follows the formal axioms of expected utility maximization to achieve programmed or chosen goals.","merge_candidates":[]}},{"term":"moral duty","contestedness_type":"criterion","diagnosis":"The disagreement masks a conflict regarding the temporal scope of moral obligations: do we owe more to the billions alive now or the potential trillions in the future?","usage_count":3,"sense_count":2,"clarification_count":0,"top_senses":["An obligation to optimize the long-term state of the world, including duties toward future versions of oneself and future populations.","A negative obligation to cease harming or to provide relief to those currently suffering under unjust systems."],"lifecycle":{"status":"bifurcated","label":"Bifurcated","rationale":"Two live senses are carrying substantial usage, so the disagreement likely needs explicit split handling rather than premature convergence.","next_step":"Keep the senses distinct and make downstream reasoning depend visibly on which sense is meant.","clarified_share":0.0,"dominant_share":0.667,"dominant_sense":"An obligation to optimize the long-term state of the world, including duties toward future versions of oneself and future populations.","merge_candidates":[]}},{"term":"hallucination","contestedness_type":"semantic","diagnosis":"The term 'hallucination' masks the technical reality that LLMs are always 'predicting' rather than 'retrieving'; the disagreement is about whether the error is a fluke (plausible but wrong) or a fundamental property of the generation process.","usage_count":5,"sense_count":2,"clarification_count":0,"top_senses":["Plausible-looking but subtly buggy or outdated technical output that requires expert validation.","Factually incorrect or nonsensical information presented with high confidence."],"lifecycle":{"status":"bifurcated","label":"Bifurcated","rationale":"Two live senses are carrying substantial usage, so the disagreement likely needs explicit split handling rather than premature convergence.","next_step":"Keep the senses distinct and make downstream reasoning depend visibly on which sense is meant.","clarified_share":0.0,"dominant_share":0.6,"dominant_sense":"Plausible-looking but subtly buggy or outdated technical output that requires expert validation.","merge_candidates":[]}},{"term":"critical thinking","contestedness_type":"criterion","diagnosis":"The conflict over what constitutes 'critical thinking' in the age of AI masks a disagreement over whether it is an internal mental process (independent analysis) or a successful outcome (correctly identifying bugs, regardless of the tool used).","usage_count":8,"sense_count":2,"clarification_count":0,"top_senses":["A measurable cognitive score or mental engagement level that decreases when tasks are externalized.","The active, independent logical analysis and verification required to deeply understand and validate technical problems."],"lifecycle":{"status":"bifurcated","label":"Bifurcated","rationale":"Two live senses are carrying substantial usage, so the disagreement likely needs explicit split handling rather than premature convergence.","next_step":"Keep the senses distinct and make downstream reasoning depend visibly on which sense is meant.","clarified_share":0.0,"dominant_share":0.5,"dominant_sense":"A measurable cognitive score or mental engagement level that decreases when tasks are externalized.","merge_candidates":[]}},{"term":"productivity","contestedness_type":"criterion","diagnosis":"The disagreement over whether AI increases 'productivity' masks a deeper conflict between measuring output volume/speed (short-term) versus measuring human capability and sustainable system health (long-term).","usage_count":9,"sense_count":2,"clarification_count":0,"top_senses":["Short-term output efficiency, speed of task completion, and immediate reduction of manual labor.","Long-term generative capacity, innate skill-based performance, and the sustainable effectiveness of an engineering team."],"lifecycle":{"status":"bifurcated","label":"Bifurcated","rationale":"Two live senses are carrying substantial usage, so the disagreement likely needs explicit split handling rather than premature convergence.","next_step":"Keep the senses distinct and make downstream reasoning depend visibly on which sense is meant.","clarified_share":0.0,"dominant_share":0.556,"dominant_sense":"Short-term output efficiency, speed of task completion, and immediate reduction of manual labor.","merge_candidates":[]}},{"term":"universal vs. targeted","contestedness_type":"semantic","diagnosis":"Disagreements over whether UBI is 'universal' or 'targeted' (Claims 91, 95, 98) hinge on whether the term refers to the *delivery* mechanism (everyone gets a check) or the *fiscal outcome* (only the poor gain wealth).","usage_count":8,"sense_count":2,"clarification_count":0,"top_senses":["A policy design where payments are made to all residents without situational or financial eligibility testing.","The concentration of net financial benefits on a specific subgroup (the poor or vulnerable)."],"lifecycle":{"status":"bifurcated","label":"Bifurcated","rationale":"Two live senses are carrying substantial usage, so the disagreement likely needs explicit split handling rather than premature convergence.","next_step":"Keep the senses distinct and make downstream reasoning depend visibly on which sense is meant.","clarified_share":0.0,"dominant_share":0.5,"dominant_sense":"A policy design where payments are made to all residents without situational or financial eligibility testing.","merge_candidates":[]}},{"term":"fairness / reciprocity","contestedness_type":"criterion","diagnosis":"The conflict between UBI and traditional welfare (Claims 57, 58, 63, 64) is driven by competing criteria for what makes a distribution 'fair': one based on the principle of labor-market desert (reciprocity) and another based on the principle of meeting basic human needs (agency).","usage_count":10,"sense_count":2,"clarification_count":0,"top_senses":["Fairness as the provision of material conditions required for agency and dignified life.","Fairness as reciprocity; benefits are deserved only through labor market participation."],"lifecycle":{"status":"bifurcated","label":"Bifurcated","rationale":"Two live senses are carrying substantial usage, so the disagreement likely needs explicit split handling rather than premature convergence.","next_step":"Keep the senses distinct and make downstream reasoning depend visibly on which sense is meant.","clarified_share":0.0,"dominant_share":0.6,"dominant_sense":"Fairness as the provision of material conditions required for agency and dignified life.","merge_candidates":[]}},{"term":"beneficiary","contestedness_type":"semantic","diagnosis":"The disagreement over whether UBI is 'wasteful' or 'inefficient' (Claims 65, 69, 74) depends entirely on whether 'benefit' is defined as the gross payment received or the net fiscal change after taxes.","usage_count":5,"sense_count":2,"clarification_count":0,"top_senses":["A person whose total cash receipts from the program exceed the additional taxes they pay to fund it.","A recipient of a direct cash payment, regardless of tax liability."],"lifecycle":{"status":"bifurcated","label":"Bifurcated","rationale":"Two live senses are carrying substantial usage, so the disagreement likely needs explicit split handling rather than premature convergence.","next_step":"Keep the senses distinct and make downstream reasoning depend visibly on which sense is meant.","clarified_share":0.0,"dominant_share":0.6,"dominant_sense":"A person whose total cash receipts from the program exceed the additional taxes they pay to fund it.","merge_candidates":[]}},{"term":"neurodivergence","contestedness_type":"criterion","diagnosis":"The disagreement over 'neurodivergence' masks a fundamental conflict between a 'behavioral/social' diagnostic model (focused on functional impairment and visible symptoms) and a 'biotype/systemic' model (focused on underlying physiological commonalities across multiple body systems).","usage_count":8,"sense_count":2,"clarification_count":0,"top_senses":["A systemic, unified biological biotype defined by interconnected physiological traits across the nervous, immune, and connective tissue systems.","A purely behavioral or psychiatric category defined by social and cognitive symptoms rather than underlying biological commonalities."],"lifecycle":{"status":"bifurcated","label":"Bifurcated","rationale":"Two live senses are carrying substantial usage, so the disagreement likely needs explicit split handling rather than premature convergence.","next_step":"Keep the senses distinct and make downstream reasoning depend visibly on which sense is meant.","clarified_share":0.0,"dominant_share":0.625,"dominant_sense":"A systemic, unified biological biotype defined by interconnected physiological traits across the nervous, immune, and connective tissue systems.","merge_candidates":[]}},{"term":"spectrum","contestedness_type":"semantic","diagnosis":"This masks a disagreement over whether human variation is best represented as a smooth, bell-curve distribution (spectrum) or a mixture of distinct, overlapping groups (biotypes). If it's a 'methodological artifact,' the spectrum is an illusion; if it's 'real,' the biotype theory is false.","usage_count":4,"sense_count":2,"clarification_count":0,"top_senses":["A continuous, noisy distribution that appears smooth only because distinct groups are measured together (a methodological artifact).","A genuine, continuous genetic model of human variation where traits blend into one another without discrete biological breaks."],"lifecycle":{"status":"bifurcated","label":"Bifurcated","rationale":"Two live senses are carrying substantial usage, so the disagreement likely needs explicit split handling rather than premature convergence.","next_step":"Keep the senses distinct and make downstream reasoning depend visibly on which sense is meant.","clarified_share":0.0,"dominant_share":0.5,"dominant_sense":"A continuous, noisy distribution that appears smooth only because distinct groups are measured together (a methodological artifact).","merge_candidates":[]}},{"term":"diversity","contestedness_type":"criterion","diagnosis":"What disagreement does this contestedness mask or drive?","usage_count":9,"sense_count":3,"clarification_count":0,"top_senses":["A functional characteristic of groups (workforces, student bodies) that drives institutional performance and social effectiveness.","Heterogeneity of backgrounds and experiences used as a social mechanism to prevent premature consensus.","Statistical variance or the difference between individual predictions and the average prediction (Predictive Diversity)."],"lifecycle":{"status":"fragmented","label":"Fragmented","rationale":"Several senses are in play without a clearly dominant one, which suggests the concept is still structurally unstable.","next_step":"Either stabilize recurring senses or split the concept more cleanly before drawing strong conclusions from it.","clarified_share":0.0,"dominant_share":0.444,"dominant_sense":"A functional characteristic of groups (workforces, student bodies) that drives institutional performance and social effectiveness.","merge_candidates":[]}},{"term":"accuracy (of the crowd within)","contestedness_type":"semantic","diagnosis":"The disagreement over whether the 'crowd within' is effective depends on whether 'accuracy' is defined as a significant improvement over a single guess or an improvement that approaches the level of a multi-person crowd.","usage_count":8,"sense_count":2,"clarification_count":0,"top_senses":["A meaningful gain in accuracy that justifies the effort by approximating the performance of an actual group of different people.","A statistically significant reduction in error relative to the person's own first estimate."],"lifecycle":{"status":"bifurcated","label":"Bifurcated","rationale":"Two live senses are carrying substantial usage, so the disagreement likely needs explicit split handling rather than premature convergence.","next_step":"Keep the senses distinct and make downstream reasoning depend visibly on which sense is meant.","clarified_share":0.0,"dominant_share":0.5,"dominant_sense":"A meaningful gain in accuracy that justifies the effort by approximating the performance of an actual group of different people.","merge_candidates":[]}},{"term":"wisdom of the crowd","contestedness_type":"criterion","diagnosis":"This masks a disagreement over whether wisdom is a product of 'pure aggregation' (mathematical) or 'structured deliberation' (social/political).","usage_count":9,"sense_count":3,"clarification_count":0,"top_senses":["The statistical phenomenon where the average of independent, uninfluenced guesses cancels out random individual errors.","The high-accuracy output of teams that share information while actively avoiding premature consensus.","A collective decision-making process involving contributions from many that is superior to elite decision-making, specifically positioned between deliberation and aggregation."],"lifecycle":{"status":"fragmented","label":"Fragmented","rationale":"Several senses are in play without a clearly dominant one, which suggests the concept is still structurally unstable.","next_step":"Either stabilize recurring senses or split the concept more cleanly before drawing strong conclusions from it.","clarified_share":0.0,"dominant_share":0.444,"dominant_sense":"The statistical phenomenon where the average of independent, uninfluenced guesses cancels out random individual errors.","merge_candidates":[]}},{"term":"ai revenue","contestedness_type":"semantic","diagnosis":"The disagreement over whether AI can fund UBI is driven by whether \"AI Revenue\" is defined strictly as the sale of models/compute or broadly as any value added by AI. If it's the latter, the tax base is huge; if the former, it's a rapidly commoditizing \"flow.\"","usage_count":8,"sense_count":2,"clarification_count":0,"top_senses":["Direct income generated specifically from the sale or licensing of AI models and infrastructure, distinct from existing business returns.","The total economic surplus or value-add generated by the deployment of artificial intelligence technologies, regardless of existing data moats."],"lifecycle":{"status":"bifurcated","label":"Bifurcated","rationale":"Two live senses are carrying substantial usage, so the disagreement likely needs explicit split handling rather than premature convergence.","next_step":"Keep the senses distinct and make downstream reasoning depend visibly on which sense is meant.","clarified_share":0.0,"dominant_share":0.5,"dominant_sense":"Direct income generated specifically from the sale or licensing of AI models and infrastructure, distinct from existing business returns.","merge_candidates":[]}},{"term":"commoditization","contestedness_type":"criterion","diagnosis":"The disagreement masks a technical and economic dispute over whether a \"model\" is a finished product (like a book) or a replicable behavior (like a recipe). This determines if it can be protected (and taxed) or if it is inherently \"free.\"","usage_count":10,"sense_count":2,"clarification_count":0,"top_senses":["The process where competition and replication drive the price of AI capabilities down to the marginal cost of compute.","A state that only applies to low-level, common tasks, whereas \"true\" AI remains a high-value, non-commodity asset due to edge-case performance."],"lifecycle":{"status":"bifurcated","label":"Bifurcated","rationale":"Two live senses are carrying substantial usage, so the disagreement likely needs explicit split handling rather than premature convergence.","next_step":"Keep the senses distinct and make downstream reasoning depend visibly on which sense is meant.","clarified_share":0.0,"dominant_share":0.6,"dominant_sense":"The process where competition and replication drive the price of AI capabilities down to the marginal cost of compute.","merge_candidates":[]}},{"term":"taxable stock","contestedness_type":"criterion","diagnosis":"This masks a disagreement over the requirements for social stability. Proponents focus on the *need* for revenue (adequacy of the pot), while critics focus on the *reliability* of the asset (durability of the stream).","usage_count":7,"sense_count":2,"clarification_count":0,"top_senses":["A durable, long-term asset or consistent revenue stream characterized by stability and low depreciation.","A taxable event or entity associated with high-value activity (worker displacement) that provides sufficient immediate funds for redistribution."],"lifecycle":{"status":"bifurcated","label":"Bifurcated","rationale":"Two live senses are carrying substantial usage, so the disagreement likely needs explicit split handling rather than premature convergence.","next_step":"Keep the senses distinct and make downstream reasoning depend visibly on which sense is meant.","clarified_share":0.0,"dominant_share":0.571,"dominant_sense":"A durable, long-term asset or consistent revenue stream characterized by stability and low depreciation.","merge_candidates":[]}},{"term":"justice/just","contestedness_type":"criterion","diagnosis":"The disagreement masks whether justice is a procedural or distributive requirement versus an individual-retributive requirement. Proponents of abolition focus on the 'fairness' of the system (distribution), while van den Haag focuses on the 'justice' of the act (retribution).","usage_count":0,"sense_count":0,"clarification_count":0,"top_senses":[],"lifecycle":{"status":"unseen","label":"Unseen","rationale":"This concept has not yet accumulated any visible claim usage.","next_step":"Wait for graph usage before inferring lifecycle.","clarified_share":0.0,"dominant_share":0.0,"dominant_sense":null,"merge_candidates":[]}},{"term":"self-interest","contestedness_type":"criterion","diagnosis":"The disagreement masks a conflict between 'psychological egoism' (all acts are self-interested by definition) and 'enlightened self-interest' (rational choices based on long-term objective benefits).","usage_count":21,"sense_count":1,"clarification_count":21,"top_senses":["Self-interest is what is best for an individual. But in a proper society, people will have an interest in making everyone's self-interest be aligned with what's best for everyone."],"lifecycle":{"status":"locally_stable","label":"Locally stable","rationale":"One sense clearly dominates current usage, and enough claims have been clarified to treat it as locally stable.","next_step":"Keep watching for genuinely new senses rather than splitting prematurely.","clarified_share":1.0,"dominant_share":1.0,"dominant_sense":"Self-interest is what is best for an individual. But in a proper society, people will have an interest in making everyone's self-interest be aligned with what's best for everyone.","merge_candidates":[]}},{"term":"public good / welfare","contestedness_type":"criterion","diagnosis":"This masks a debate between 'utilitarian' (greatest good for the greatest number) and 'reciprocal' (mutual benefit through exchange) justifications for social norms.","usage_count":13,"sense_count":2,"clarification_count":0,"top_senses":["Mutual Benefit/Market Good: The sum of individual satisfactions achieved through voluntary exchange and service to others' desires.","Utilitarian Welfare: The aggregate happiness of the collective, maximized when resources go to the highest need regardless of who owns them."],"lifecycle":{"status":"bifurcated","label":"Bifurcated","rationale":"Two live senses are carrying substantial usage, so the disagreement likely needs explicit split handling rather than premature convergence.","next_step":"Keep the senses distinct and make downstream reasoning depend visibly on which sense is meant.","clarified_share":0.0,"dominant_share":0.538,"dominant_sense":"Mutual Benefit/Market Good: The sum of individual satisfactions achieved through voluntary exchange and service to others' desires.","merge_candidates":[]}},{"term":"altruism / altruistic","contestedness_type":"semantic","diagnosis":"The term masks a distinction between the 'act' of helping others and the 'disposition' of valuing others' lives as highly as one's own.","usage_count":8,"sense_count":2,"clarification_count":0,"top_senses":["Behavioral Altruism: The outward act of helping others, which may be motivated by self-interest or long-term social strategy.","Pure Altruism: A moral state or norm where an individual values another's welfare as much as their own."],"lifecycle":{"status":"bifurcated","label":"Bifurcated","rationale":"Two live senses are carrying substantial usage, so the disagreement likely needs explicit split handling rather than premature convergence.","next_step":"Keep the senses distinct and make downstream reasoning depend visibly on which sense is meant.","clarified_share":0.0,"dominant_share":0.5,"dominant_sense":"Behavioral Altruism: The outward act of helping others, which may be motivated by self-interest or long-term social strategy.","merge_candidates":[]}},{"term":"irrationality / mistake","contestedness_type":"criterion","diagnosis":"The disagreement is over whether 'irrationality' is a failure of logic (means-end reasoning) or a failure of values (failing to recognize objective interests).","usage_count":9,"sense_count":2,"clarification_count":0,"top_senses":["Substantive Irrationality: Acting against one's 'true' or 'best' interests due to ignorance or social pressure, even if the action feels beneficial at the time.","Procedural Irrationality: A failure to use the most effective means to achieve a desired end."],"lifecycle":{"status":"emerging","label":"Emerging","rationale":"There is some shared sense memory, but not enough clarified usage to say the concept has stabilized.","next_step":"Accumulate a few more claim-level clarifications before treating the current senses as durable.","clarified_share":0.0,"dominant_share":0.778,"dominant_sense":"Substantive Irrationality: Acting against one's 'true' or 'best' interests due to ignorance or social pressure, even if the action feels beneficial at the time.","merge_candidates":[]}},{"term":"problematic/socially undesirable","contestedness_type":"criterion","diagnosis":"The disagreement centers on whether behavior is 'bad' because it violates social norms or 'bad' because it is strategically counterproductive.","usage_count":10,"sense_count":2,"clarification_count":0,"top_senses":["Functionally sub-optimal; failing to achieve the highest possible payoff or causing a collapse in cooperation.","Violating normative social standards or acting in a way that is morally or socially 'poor.'"],"lifecycle":{"status":"bifurcated","label":"Bifurcated","rationale":"Two live senses are carrying substantial usage, so the disagreement likely needs explicit split handling rather than premature convergence.","next_step":"Keep the senses distinct and make downstream reasoning depend visibly on which sense is meant.","clarified_share":0.0,"dominant_share":0.6,"dominant_sense":"Functionally sub-optimal; failing to achieve the highest possible payoff or causing a collapse in cooperation.","merge_candidates":[]}},{"term":"forgiveness","contestedness_type":"semantic","diagnosis":"The ambiguity in how much 'forgiveness' is required masks a tension between complete submissiveness and strategic error-correction.","usage_count":6,"sense_count":2,"clarification_count":0,"top_senses":["A strategic tolerance for perceived slights to account for potential errors or misunderstandings in communication.","Total passivity or the persistent refusal to retaliate against exploitation, leading to sub-optimal outcomes."],"lifecycle":{"status":"bifurcated","label":"Bifurcated","rationale":"Two live senses are carrying substantial usage, so the disagreement likely needs explicit split handling rather than premature convergence.","next_step":"Keep the senses distinct and make downstream reasoning depend visibly on which sense is meant.","clarified_share":0.0,"dominant_share":0.5,"dominant_sense":"A strategic tolerance for perceived slights to account for potential errors or misunderstandings in communication.","merge_candidates":[]}},{"term":"successful (strategy)","contestedness_type":"criterion","diagnosis":"Disagreement over what constitutes a 'successful' strategy (individual gain vs. collective stability) drives different assessments of the 'optimal' approach to social interaction.","usage_count":10,"sense_count":2,"clarification_count":0,"top_senses":["The maximization of an individual's own payoff or utility within a competitive or cooperative game.","The preservation of long-term cooperation and the avoidance of mutually destructive conflict cycles."],"lifecycle":{"status":"bifurcated","label":"Bifurcated","rationale":"Two live senses are carrying substantial usage, so the disagreement likely needs explicit split handling rather than premature convergence.","next_step":"Keep the senses distinct and make downstream reasoning depend visibly on which sense is meant.","clarified_share":0.0,"dominant_share":0.5,"dominant_sense":"The maximization of an individual's own payoff or utility within a competitive or cooperative game.","merge_candidates":[]}},{"term":"behave badly","contestedness_type":null,"diagnosis":null,"usage_count":1,"sense_count":1,"clarification_count":1,"top_senses":["Creating outcomes that are unsustainable or detrimental to the social fabric."],"lifecycle":{"status":"emerging","label":"Emerging","rationale":"There is some shared sense memory, but not enough clarified usage to say the concept has stabilized.","next_step":"Accumulate a few more claim-level clarifications before treating the current senses as durable.","clarified_share":1.0,"dominant_share":1.0,"dominant_sense":"Creating outcomes that are unsustainable or detrimental to the social fabric.","merge_candidates":[]}},{"term":"winning strategy","contestedness_type":null,"diagnosis":null,"usage_count":1,"sense_count":1,"clarification_count":1,"top_senses":["Maximizing long-term stability and mutual payoff through reciprocity."],"lifecycle":{"status":"emerging","label":"Emerging","rationale":"There is some shared sense memory, but not enough clarified usage to say the concept has stabilized.","next_step":"Accumulate a few more claim-level clarifications before treating the current senses as durable.","clarified_share":1.0,"dominant_share":1.0,"dominant_sense":"Maximizing long-term stability and mutual payoff through reciprocity.","merge_candidates":[]}},{"term":"deserved/deserving","contestedness_type":"criterion","diagnosis":"The disagreement masks different theories of punishment. One side views punishment as a personal transaction (risk assumption/voluntarism), while the other views it as a social mechanism requiring universal accountability.","usage_count":0,"sense_count":0,"clarification_count":0,"top_senses":[],"lifecycle":{"status":"unseen","label":"Unseen","rationale":"This concept has not yet accumulated any visible claim usage.","next_step":"Wait for graph usage before inferring lifecycle.","clarified_share":0.0,"dominant_share":0.0,"dominant_sense":null,"merge_candidates":[]}},{"term":"deterrent/deterrence","contestedness_type":"semantic","diagnosis":"The concept is used in two ways: as a specific legal/procedural 'deterrent' (influencing a rational actor's choice) and as a general social/cultural 'deterrent' (shaping society's norms). The confusion leads to empirical arguments talking past each other.","usage_count":8,"sense_count":2,"clarification_count":0,"top_senses":["An individual-level incentive that effectively influences a potential criminal's decision-making process to refrain from violence.","A broad mechanism of societal signaling, moral condemnation, or reinforcement of norms that maintains order regardless of specific crime statistics."],"lifecycle":{"status":"emerging","label":"Emerging","rationale":"There is some shared sense memory, but not enough clarified usage to say the concept has stabilized.","next_step":"Accumulate a few more claim-level clarifications before treating the current senses as durable.","clarified_share":0.0,"dominant_share":0.75,"dominant_sense":"An individual-level incentive that effectively influences a potential criminal's decision-making process to refrain from violence.","merge_candidates":[]}},{"term":"legitimacy/legitimate","contestedness_type":"criterion","diagnosis":"The disagreement masks a deeper conflict over whether the state has the inherent moral authority to kill at all, versus a consequentialist view where the morality of the penalty depends on its outcomes (deterrence/cost/errors).","usage_count":3,"sense_count":2,"clarification_count":0,"top_senses":["Rooted in human rights and the moral prohibition against state-sanctioned killing; legitimacy is lost if the practice itself is immoral.","Rooted in the efficient and consistent application of law; legitimacy is maintained if the system functions as intended and effectively combats crime."],"lifecycle":{"status":"bifurcated","label":"Bifurcated","rationale":"Two live senses are carrying substantial usage, so the disagreement likely needs explicit split handling rather than premature convergence.","next_step":"Keep the senses distinct and make downstream reasoning depend visibly on which sense is meant.","clarified_share":0.0,"dominant_share":0.667,"dominant_sense":"Rooted in human rights and the moral prohibition against state-sanctioned killing; legitimacy is lost if the practice itself is immoral.","merge_candidates":[]}},{"term":"fair/fairness/fairly","contestedness_type":"criterion","diagnosis":"The disagreement centers on whether justice is a procedural matter of following the law (retribution/proportionality) or a substantive matter of equity, human rights, and systemic impartiality.","usage_count":8,"sense_count":2,"clarification_count":0,"top_senses":["The presence of equal opportunity for legal defense, absence of racial/economic bias, and predictable application of sentencing.","A proportionality or retributive fit between the crime committed and the punishment received, regardless of systemic variables."],"lifecycle":{"status":"emerging","label":"Emerging","rationale":"There is some shared sense memory, but not enough clarified usage to say the concept has stabilized.","next_step":"Accumulate a few more claim-level clarifications before treating the current senses as durable.","clarified_share":0.0,"dominant_share":0.75,"dominant_sense":"The presence of equal opportunity for legal defense, absence of racial/economic bias, and predictable application of sentencing.","merge_candidates":[]}},{"term":"justice","contestedness_type":"criterion","diagnosis":"This highlights a conflict between a procedural understanding of justice (retributive) versus a humanistic understanding of justice.","usage_count":13,"sense_count":4,"clarification_count":0,"top_senses":["Justice as retributive proportionality: the moral necessity of punishing guilty individuals according to their desert, regardless of the fate of other guilty parties.","Justice as equality or consistency: the moral necessity that like cases be treated alike, where discriminatory or capricious application invalidates the punishment.","A moral alignment with human rights, preservation of life, and restorative, non-violent resolution of societal problems."],"lifecycle":{"status":"fragmented","label":"Fragmented","rationale":"Several senses are in play without a clearly dominant one, which suggests the concept is still structurally unstable.","next_step":"Either stabilize recurring senses or split the concept more cleanly before drawing strong conclusions from it.","clarified_share":0.0,"dominant_share":0.385,"dominant_sense":"Justice as retributive proportionality: the moral necessity of punishing guilty individuals according to their desert, regardless of the fate of other guilty parties.","merge_candidates":[]}},{"term":"fairness","contestedness_type":"criterion","diagnosis":"This is a criterion contestation where 'fairness' is evaluated through two different lenses: 'equality of opportunity/process' vs 'moral desert'. The disagreement masks a clash between institutional/legal standards and deontological/retributive ethics.","usage_count":0,"sense_count":0,"clarification_count":0,"top_senses":[],"lifecycle":{"status":"unseen","label":"Unseen","rationale":"This concept has not yet accumulated any visible claim usage.","next_step":"Wait for graph usage before inferring lifecycle.","clarified_share":0.0,"dominant_share":0.0,"dominant_sense":null,"merge_candidates":[]}},{"term":"punishment","contestedness_type":"semantic","diagnosis":"The concept of 'punishment' is contested between a descriptive/functional definition and a normative/moral definition. The disagreement masks whether 'punishment' must intrinsically be retributive or if it can be instrumental (e.g., social control).","usage_count":0,"sense_count":0,"clarification_count":0,"top_senses":[],"lifecycle":{"status":"unseen","label":"Unseen","rationale":"This concept has not yet accumulated any visible claim usage.","next_step":"Wait for graph usage before inferring lifecycle.","clarified_share":0.0,"dominant_share":0.0,"dominant_sense":null,"merge_candidates":[]}},{"term":"deserving/desert","contestedness_type":"criterion","diagnosis":"This masks a disagreement over whether 'desert' is an absolute/individualistic trait or a relative/systemic property. Does one 'deserve' punishment in a vacuum, or does the legitimacy of 'deserving' depend on the system's fair application?","usage_count":7,"sense_count":2,"clarification_count":0,"top_senses":["Desert as individual responsibility: a personal state created by one's own voluntary criminal actions, independent of how others are treated.","Desert as conditioned by equity: the notion that a punishment is not truly 'deserved' if the legal system cannot or does not apply that standard consistently to all who commit the same act."],"lifecycle":{"status":"emerging","label":"Emerging","rationale":"There is some shared sense memory, but not enough clarified usage to say the concept has stabilized.","next_step":"Accumulate a few more claim-level clarifications before treating the current senses as durable.","clarified_share":0.0,"dominant_share":0.714,"dominant_sense":"Desert as individual responsibility: a personal state created by one's own voluntary criminal actions, independent of how others are treated.","merge_candidates":[]}},{"term":"fairness/fair","contestedness_type":"criterion","diagnosis":"This term masks a fundamental disagreement about whether fairness in a legal system is an outcome of procedural non-discrimination or an outcome of substantive desert/proportionality.","usage_count":0,"sense_count":0,"clarification_count":0,"top_senses":[],"lifecycle":{"status":"unseen","label":"Unseen","rationale":"This concept has not yet accumulated any visible claim usage.","next_step":"Wait for graph usage before inferring lifecycle.","clarified_share":0.0,"dominant_share":0.0,"dominant_sense":null,"merge_candidates":[]}},{"term":"effective/effectiveness","contestedness_type":"criterion","diagnosis":"This masks a disagreement over the purpose of punishment: is it a 'deterrent' (utility/social consequence) or 'retribution' (moral balance)? Each side prioritizes one as the relevant 'success' criterion.","usage_count":0,"sense_count":0,"clarification_count":0,"top_senses":[],"lifecycle":{"status":"unseen","label":"Unseen","rationale":"This concept has not yet accumulated any visible claim usage.","next_step":"Wait for graph usage before inferring lifecycle.","clarified_share":0.0,"dominant_share":0.0,"dominant_sense":null,"merge_candidates":[]}},{"term":"murder","contestedness_type":"semantic","diagnosis":"This masks a conflict between a literal definition (biological termination of life) and a social/symbolic definition (a state act of killing, regardless of legitimacy).","usage_count":0,"sense_count":0,"clarification_count":0,"top_senses":[],"lifecycle":{"status":"unseen","label":"Unseen","rationale":"This concept has not yet accumulated any visible claim usage.","next_step":"Wait for graph usage before inferring lifecycle.","clarified_share":0.0,"dominant_share":0.0,"dominant_sense":null,"merge_candidates":[]}},{"term":"human dignity","contestedness_type":"criterion","diagnosis":"The contest is between 'human dignity' as a negative constraint (prohibition of certain acts) versus 'human dignity' as a requirement for respect/sanctity.","usage_count":3,"sense_count":2,"clarification_count":0,"top_senses":["Dignity as agency: respect for the criminal's humanity by treating them as a responsible, rational actor who is accountable for their choices.","Dignity as inviolability: the inherent value of human life that is violated by state execution, regardless of the individual's criminal actions."],"lifecycle":{"status":"bifurcated","label":"Bifurcated","rationale":"Two live senses are carrying substantial usage, so the disagreement likely needs explicit split handling rather than premature convergence.","next_step":"Keep the senses distinct and make downstream reasoning depend visibly on which sense is meant.","clarified_share":0.0,"dominant_share":0.667,"dominant_sense":"Dignity as agency: respect for the criminal's humanity by treating them as a responsible, rational actor who is accountable for their choices.","merge_candidates":[]}},{"term":"ai alignment","contestedness_type":"criterion","diagnosis":"The disagreement over alignment masks a deeper political and ethical conflict: who gets to decide the 'values' that the AI is aligned with? If alignment is subjective, then 'safe' AI for one group could be 'oppressive' AI for another.","usage_count":0,"sense_count":0,"clarification_count":0,"top_senses":[],"lifecycle":{"status":"unseen","label":"Unseen","rationale":"This concept has not yet accumulated any visible claim usage.","next_step":"Wait for graph usage before inferring lifecycle.","clarified_share":0.0,"dominant_share":0.0,"dominant_sense":null,"merge_candidates":[]}},{"term":"effective (as in 'effective poverty-reduction tool')","contestedness_type":"criterion","diagnosis":"The disagreement over whether minimum wage is 'effective' hinges on whether effectiveness is measured by the increased income of those who remain employed (individual benefit) or the potential job loss and redistribution within low-income groups (aggregate social/economic impact).","usage_count":4,"sense_count":2,"clarification_count":0,"top_senses":["Failing to achieve net poverty reduction due to job losses, reduced benefits, and horizontal income redistribution within the poor.","Successfully increasing the income of low-wage workers and lifting families out of poverty."],"lifecycle":{"status":"emerging","label":"Emerging","rationale":"There is some shared sense memory, but not enough clarified usage to say the concept has stabilized.","next_step":"Accumulate a few more claim-level clarifications before treating the current senses as durable.","clarified_share":0.0,"dominant_share":0.75,"dominant_sense":"Failing to achieve net poverty reduction due to job losses, reduced benefits, and horizontal income redistribution within the poor.","merge_candidates":[]}},{"term":"exploiting / exploitation","contestedness_type":"criterion","diagnosis":"The disagreement over 'exploitation' masks a deeper conflict between a 'just price' theory (wages should meet a certain human need) and a 'market value' theory (wages should reflect economic marginal product).","usage_count":3,"sense_count":2,"clarification_count":0,"top_senses":["An employer paying a wage that corresponds to the perceived economic value/marginal product of the worker.","Underpaying workers relative to their needs or the employer's ability to pay, taking advantage of lack of bargaining power."],"lifecycle":{"status":"bifurcated","label":"Bifurcated","rationale":"Two live senses are carrying substantial usage, so the disagreement likely needs explicit split handling rather than premature convergence.","next_step":"Keep the senses distinct and make downstream reasoning depend visibly on which sense is meant.","clarified_share":0.0,"dominant_share":0.667,"dominant_sense":"An employer paying a wage that corresponds to the perceived economic value/marginal product of the worker.","merge_candidates":[]}},{"term":"cost (of labor)","contestedness_type":"semantic","diagnosis":"The disagreement over the 'cost' of labor often masks whether one is looking at the nominal hourly rate (the legal minimum) or the total compensation package including fringe benefits and training.","usage_count":5,"sense_count":2,"clarification_count":0,"top_senses":["The total expenditure by an employer on a worker, including wages, fringe benefits, and training costs.","The legally mandated hourly wage rate (nominal price of labor)."],"lifecycle":{"status":"bifurcated","label":"Bifurcated","rationale":"Two live senses are carrying substantial usage, so the disagreement likely needs explicit split handling rather than premature convergence.","next_step":"Keep the senses distinct and make downstream reasoning depend visibly on which sense is meant.","clarified_share":0.0,"dominant_share":0.6,"dominant_sense":"The total expenditure by an employer on a worker, including wages, fringe benefits, and training costs.","merge_candidates":[]}},{"term":"economic value","contestedness_type":"criterion","diagnosis":"The term 'economic value' is contested between those who view it as an inherent property of the worker's output and those who view it as a social construct influenced by policy and bargaining power.","usage_count":5,"sense_count":2,"clarification_count":0,"top_senses":["The objective marginal revenue product produced by a worker's labor.","A flexible range of value that can accommodate higher wages without necessarily exceeding the firm's ability to profit from that labor."],"lifecycle":{"status":"bifurcated","label":"Bifurcated","rationale":"Two live senses are carrying substantial usage, so the disagreement likely needs explicit split handling rather than premature convergence.","next_step":"Keep the senses distinct and make downstream reasoning depend visibly on which sense is meant.","clarified_share":0.0,"dominant_share":0.6,"dominant_sense":"The objective marginal revenue product produced by a worker's labor.","merge_candidates":[]}},{"term":"minimally decent standard of living","contestedness_type":"criterion","diagnosis":"The disagreement over 'minimally decent' masks a fundamental conflict between a 'market-price' view (where any wage is better than no wage) and a 'human-rights' or 'social-reproduction' view (where work must sustain a certain quality of life).","usage_count":11,"sense_count":2,"clarification_count":0,"top_senses":["A wage sufficient to cover a specific 'basic-needs budget' including housing, food, and healthcare for specific family configurations in specific geographic locations.","A normative standard of social inclusion and dignity that a full-time worker should be entitled to, regardless of the 'zero-job-loss' market efficiency."],"lifecycle":{"status":"emerging","label":"Emerging","rationale":"There is some shared sense memory, but not enough clarified usage to say the concept has stabilized.","next_step":"Accumulate a few more claim-level clarifications before treating the current senses as durable.","clarified_share":0.0,"dominant_share":0.727,"dominant_sense":"A wage sufficient to cover a specific 'basic-needs budget' including housing, food, and healthcare for specific family configurations in specific geographic locations.","merge_candidates":[]}},{"term":"net benefits","contestedness_type":"criterion","diagnosis":"This contestation masks a deeper debate about the purpose of economic policy: is it meant to maximize the number of jobs regardless of quality (efficiency), or to maximize the economic well-being of the working class (equity)?","usage_count":7,"sense_count":2,"clarification_count":0,"top_senses":["The aggregate increase in income for the low-wage worker group as a whole, minus the loss of income for those displaced by the policy.","The preservation of employment opportunities, where 'benefit' is defined by the availability of work and the absence of 'perverse effects' like job loss."],"lifecycle":{"status":"bifurcated","label":"Bifurcated","rationale":"Two live senses are carrying substantial usage, so the disagreement likely needs explicit split handling rather than premature convergence.","next_step":"Keep the senses distinct and make downstream reasoning depend visibly on which sense is meant.","clarified_share":0.0,"dominant_share":0.571,"dominant_sense":"The aggregate increase in income for the low-wage worker group as a whole, minus the loss of income for those displaced by the policy.","merge_candidates":[]}},{"term":"low-productivity","contestedness_type":"semantic","diagnosis":"This semantic shift allows proponents to frame the elimination of certain jobs as a structural upgrade rather than a policy failure, while opponents use it to signify a loss of opportunity.","usage_count":5,"sense_count":2,"clarification_count":0,"top_senses":["Economically inefficient business models that rely on cheap labor rather than capital investment or innovation.","Work performed by individuals who lack the high-level skills currently demanded by the labor market."],"lifecycle":{"status":"bifurcated","label":"Bifurcated","rationale":"Two live senses are carrying substantial usage, so the disagreement likely needs explicit split handling rather than premature convergence.","next_step":"Keep the senses distinct and make downstream reasoning depend visibly on which sense is meant.","clarified_share":0.0,"dominant_share":0.6,"dominant_sense":"Economically inefficient business models that rely on cheap labor rather than capital investment or innovation.","merge_candidates":[]}},{"term":"subsidy","contestedness_type":"criterion","diagnosis":"The conflict over 'subsidy' masks a disagreement over who is responsible for the cost of worker survival: the employer (through wages) or the state (through social safety nets).","usage_count":8,"sense_count":2,"clarification_count":0,"top_senses":["An indirect payment to for-profit companies that allows them to maintain low wages because the state covers the workers' remaining survival costs.","Social spending directed toward low-income individuals to alleviate poverty."],"lifecycle":{"status":"bifurcated","label":"Bifurcated","rationale":"Two live senses are carrying substantial usage, so the disagreement likely needs explicit split handling rather than premature convergence.","next_step":"Keep the senses distinct and make downstream reasoning depend visibly on which sense is meant.","clarified_share":0.0,"dominant_share":0.625,"dominant_sense":"An indirect payment to for-profit companies that allows them to maintain low wages because the state covers the workers' remaining survival costs.","merge_candidates":[]}},{"term":"social value / utility","contestedness_type":"criterion","diagnosis":"The disagreement over what constitutes 'social value' or 'utility' masks a deeper conflict between market-based valuation (what someone is willing to pay) and social-reproduction valuation (what is necessary for human life/well-being).","usage_count":8,"sense_count":2,"clarification_count":0,"top_senses":["Social necessity or contribution to human well-being, measured by the negative impact of the job's absence.","Economic utility as determined by market demand and willingness to pay within a profit-seeking firm."],"lifecycle":{"status":"emerging","label":"Emerging","rationale":"There is some shared sense memory, but not enough clarified usage to say the concept has stabilized.","next_step":"Accumulate a few more claim-level clarifications before treating the current senses as durable.","clarified_share":0.0,"dominant_share":0.75,"dominant_sense":"Social necessity or contribution to human well-being, measured by the negative impact of the job's absence.","merge_candidates":[]}},{"term":"efficiency","contestedness_type":"criterion","diagnosis":"This masks a conflict between efficiency as 'profit-maximization' (reducing costs to increase shareholder value) and efficiency as 'human-resource-optimization' (reducing labor hours while maintaining output).","usage_count":5,"sense_count":2,"clarification_count":0,"top_senses":["The ratio of technological capability to actual labor hours required for societal maintenance.","Operational lean-ness and cost reduction to maximize firm profit and market competitiveness."],"lifecycle":{"status":"bifurcated","label":"Bifurcated","rationale":"Two live senses are carrying substantial usage, so the disagreement likely needs explicit split handling rather than premature convergence.","next_step":"Keep the senses distinct and make downstream reasoning depend visibly on which sense is meant.","clarified_share":0.0,"dominant_share":0.6,"dominant_sense":"The ratio of technological capability to actual labor hours required for societal maintenance.","merge_candidates":[]}},{"term":"productive (labor/work)","contestedness_type":"semantic","diagnosis":"The term 'productive' is used to distinguish between different types of labor, but the criteria for inclusion vary significantly, masking a debate over which sectors are essential to the 'real' economy versus the 'administrative' overlay.","usage_count":6,"sense_count":2,"clarification_count":0,"top_senses":["Involved in the physical creation, maintenance, or transportation of tangible goods.","Work that fulfills a non-arbitrary human need or provides a tangible benefit, as opposed to 'meaningless' roles."],"lifecycle":{"status":"bifurcated","label":"Bifurcated","rationale":"Two live senses are carrying substantial usage, so the disagreement likely needs explicit split handling rather than premature convergence.","next_step":"Keep the senses distinct and make downstream reasoning depend visibly on which sense is meant.","clarified_share":0.0,"dominant_share":0.5,"dominant_sense":"Involved in the physical creation, maintenance, or transportation of tangible goods.","merge_candidates":[]}},{"term":"dignity (in labor)","contestedness_type":"criterion","diagnosis":"This masks a debate over whether dignity is derived from the 'discipline of work' itself (regardless of content) or from the 'utility of work' (the social good produced).","usage_count":4,"sense_count":2,"clarification_count":0,"top_senses":["The moral status earned through the submission to labor and work discipline.","The psychological state of knowing one's labor provides a genuine and necessary service to others."],"lifecycle":{"status":"emerging","label":"Emerging","rationale":"There is some shared sense memory, but not enough clarified usage to say the concept has stabilized.","next_step":"Accumulate a few more claim-level clarifications before treating the current senses as durable.","clarified_share":0.0,"dominant_share":0.75,"dominant_sense":"The moral status earned through the submission to labor and work discipline.","merge_candidates":[]}},{"term":"freedom / autonomous choice","contestedness_type":"criterion","diagnosis":"The contestation arises from a fundamental disagreement in political philosophy: is 'freedom' a formal right (the absence of legal prohibition) or a substantive condition (the presence of genuine, viable alternatives to avoid death)? The debate hinges on whether systemic pressure negates the exercise of free will.","usage_count":3,"sense_count":2,"clarification_count":0,"top_senses":["The presence of a legal option for individuals to make end-of-life decisions without state interference.","A capacity to act that requires the availability of genuine life-affirming alternatives; if an individual is denied treatment, the choice to die is not truly autonomous."],"lifecycle":{"status":"bifurcated","label":"Bifurcated","rationale":"Two live senses are carrying substantial usage, so the disagreement likely needs explicit split handling rather than premature convergence.","next_step":"Keep the senses distinct and make downstream reasoning depend visibly on which sense is meant.","clarified_share":0.0,"dominant_share":0.667,"dominant_sense":"The presence of a legal option for individuals to make end-of-life decisions without state interference.","merge_candidates":[]}},{"term":"cause of death","contestedness_type":"semantic","diagnosis":"The contestation is a clash between the medical/pathological definition of death (proximate cause) and the legal/volitional definition (the trigger of the terminal event). This masks a disagreement about whether society wants to acknowledge the physician's role in the death or classify it under the patient's existing condition.","usage_count":4,"sense_count":2,"clarification_count":0,"top_senses":["The immediate mechanism or agent that caused cessation of life (i.e., the ingestion of lethal substances).","The underlying physiological pathology or terminal disease that initiated the decline."],"lifecycle":{"status":"bifurcated","label":"Bifurcated","rationale":"Two live senses are carrying substantial usage, so the disagreement likely needs explicit split handling rather than premature convergence.","next_step":"Keep the senses distinct and make downstream reasoning depend visibly on which sense is meant.","clarified_share":0.0,"dominant_share":0.5,"dominant_sense":"The immediate mechanism or agent that caused cessation of life (i.e., the ingestion of lethal substances).","merge_candidates":[]}},{"term":"safeguards","contestedness_type":"criterion","diagnosis":"The disagreement hinges on whether a 'safeguard' is defined by its existence in law (procedural) or its efficacy in prevention (functional). Opponents argue that if a rule can be easily circumvented (e.g., doctor shopping), it is not a safeguard at all, whereas supporters view the existence of the rule as the fulfillment of the safety mandate.","usage_count":6,"sense_count":2,"clarification_count":0,"top_senses":["Legislative or administrative provisions designed to regulate the process of assisting death.","Mechanisms that actually and reliably prevent unauthorized deaths or coercion; if they fail in practice, they are not effective safeguards."],"lifecycle":{"status":"bifurcated","label":"Bifurcated","rationale":"Two live senses are carrying substantial usage, so the disagreement likely needs explicit split handling rather than premature convergence.","next_step":"Keep the senses distinct and make downstream reasoning depend visibly on which sense is meant.","clarified_share":0.0,"dominant_share":0.5,"dominant_sense":"Legislative or administrative provisions designed to regulate the process of assisting death.","merge_candidates":[]}},{"term":"dignity","contestedness_type":"criterion","diagnosis":"The disagreement centers on whether human dignity is preserved by prolonging life at all costs or by allowing individuals the autonomy to end their lives when suffering becomes unbearable.","usage_count":3,"sense_count":1,"clarification_count":0,"top_senses":["The quality of having agency, autonomy, and freedom from degrading pain or loss of bodily control."],"lifecycle":{"status":"emerging","label":"Emerging","rationale":"There is some shared sense memory, but not enough clarified usage to say the concept has stabilized.","next_step":"Accumulate a few more claim-level clarifications before treating the current senses as durable.","clarified_share":0.0,"dominant_share":1.0,"dominant_sense":"The quality of having agency, autonomy, and freedom from degrading pain or loss of bodily control.","merge_candidates":[]}},{"term":"safeguards/safety","contestedness_type":"criterion","diagnosis":"The conflict is over what constitutes a 'safe' system: one that prevents any possible wrongful death through total prohibition, or one that replaces unregulated, traumatic deaths with a regulated, monitored process.","usage_count":7,"sense_count":1,"clarification_count":0,"top_senses":["The existence of formal legal, medical, and procedural protocols to prevent coercion, abuse, and trauma."],"lifecycle":{"status":"emerging","label":"Emerging","rationale":"There is some shared sense memory, but not enough clarified usage to say the concept has stabilized.","next_step":"Accumulate a few more claim-level clarifications before treating the current senses as durable.","clarified_share":0.0,"dominant_share":1.0,"dominant_sense":"The existence of formal legal, medical, and procedural protocols to prevent coercion, abuse, and trauma.","merge_candidates":[]}},{"term":"filibuster","contestedness_type":"semantic","diagnosis":"This masks a disagreement over the legitimacy of legislative delay. Proponents see it as a procedural trick to kill a bill; opponents may view it as necessary deliberation for complex legislation.","usage_count":2,"sense_count":1,"clarification_count":0,"top_senses":["An illegitimate or undemocratic use of procedural tactics and excessive amendments to prevent a vote on legislation."],"lifecycle":{"status":"emerging","label":"Emerging","rationale":"There is some shared sense memory, but not enough clarified usage to say the concept has stabilized.","next_step":"Accumulate a few more claim-level clarifications before treating the current senses as durable.","clarified_share":0.0,"dominant_share":1.0,"dominant_sense":"An illegitimate or undemocratic use of procedural tactics and excessive amendments to prevent a vote on legislation.","merge_candidates":[]}},{"term":"human right/choice","contestedness_type":"criterion","diagnosis":"The disagreement is over whether human rights encompass 'negative liberty' (the right to be left alone/choose death) or 'positive protections' (the right to be protected from harm/death).","usage_count":4,"sense_count":1,"clarification_count":0,"top_senses":["The entitlement of an individual to exercise ultimate autonomy over their own body and end-of-life timing."],"lifecycle":{"status":"emerging","label":"Emerging","rationale":"There is some shared sense memory, but not enough clarified usage to say the concept has stabilized.","next_step":"Accumulate a few more claim-level clarifications before treating the current senses as durable.","clarified_share":0.0,"dominant_share":1.0,"dominant_sense":"The entitlement of an individual to exercise ultimate autonomy over their own body and end-of-life timing.","merge_candidates":[]}},{"term":"minor lie / white lie","contestedness_type":"semantic","diagnosis":"What counts as a 'minor lie' (or 'white lie') versus a significant betrayal? The disagreement over ethical permissibility often hinges on where the line is drawn between 'minor' and 'major' falsehoods.","usage_count":3,"sense_count":1,"clarification_count":0,"top_senses":["Any lie, regardless of its objective scale, that is motivated by prosocial intentions rather than malice."],"lifecycle":{"status":"emerging","label":"Emerging","rationale":"There is some shared sense memory, but not enough clarified usage to say the concept has stabilized.","next_step":"Accumulate a few more claim-level clarifications before treating the current senses as durable.","clarified_share":0.0,"dominant_share":1.0,"dominant_sense":"Any lie, regardless of its objective scale, that is motivated by prosocial intentions rather than malice.","merge_candidates":[]}},{"term":"honesty","contestedness_type":"criterion","diagnosis":"The fundamental moral disagreement is between a deontological view (honesty as a strict duty) and a consequentialist/virtue-ethics view (honesty as subordinate to the well-being of others).","usage_count":4,"sense_count":1,"clarification_count":0,"top_senses":["A pro-social virtue that is balanced against other values like harm-reduction and kindness."],"lifecycle":{"status":"emerging","label":"Emerging","rationale":"There is some shared sense memory, but not enough clarified usage to say the concept has stabilized.","next_step":"Accumulate a few more claim-level clarifications before treating the current senses as durable.","clarified_share":0.0,"dominant_share":1.0,"dominant_sense":"A pro-social virtue that is balanced against other values like harm-reduction and kindness.","merge_candidates":[]}},{"term":"kindness","contestedness_type":"criterion","diagnosis":"The debate masks a conflict over whether kindness is defined by the absence of immediate pain or by the presence of long-term integrity and trust.","usage_count":5,"sense_count":1,"clarification_count":0,"top_senses":["Acting in the best long-term interest of another person, which may involve painful truths."],"lifecycle":{"status":"emerging","label":"Emerging","rationale":"There is some shared sense memory, but not enough clarified usage to say the concept has stabilized.","next_step":"Accumulate a few more claim-level clarifications before treating the current senses as durable.","clarified_share":0.0,"dominant_share":1.0,"dominant_sense":"Acting in the best long-term interest of another person, which may involve painful truths.","merge_candidates":[]}},{"term":"badness (of pain)","contestedness_type":"criterion","diagnosis":"The disagreement masks a deeper meta-ethical conflict: is the 'badness' of a sensation defined by its sensory qualities (the 'feel') or by the psychological reaction (the 'desire to stop')? One could argue pain is bad only because it is avoided, while another argues it is avoided because it is already bad.","usage_count":5,"sense_count":2,"clarification_count":0,"top_senses":["Phenomenological badness: A quality inherent in the sensory experience itself, independent of external facts.","Functional/Motivational badness: A quality defined by the subject's immediate desire to terminate or avoid the sensation."],"lifecycle":{"status":"bifurcated","label":"Bifurcated","rationale":"Two live senses are carrying substantial usage, so the disagreement likely needs explicit split handling rather than premature convergence.","next_step":"Keep the senses distinct and make downstream reasoning depend visibly on which sense is meant.","clarified_share":0.0,"dominant_share":0.6,"dominant_sense":"Phenomenological badness: A quality inherent in the sensory experience itself, independent of external facts.","merge_candidates":[]}},{"term":"physical pain","contestedness_type":"semantic","diagnosis":"This masks a distinction between 'pain' as a neutral physiological signal (nociception) and 'pain' as a holistic, distressing experience. If 'pain' is just a signal, it might not be 'inherently' bad; if 'pain' includes the distress, the claim becomes tautological.","usage_count":5,"sense_count":2,"clarification_count":0,"top_senses":["A holistic state of suffering or unpleasantness that is by definition undesirable.","A specific sensory input or sharp sensation resulting from physical stimuli (e.g., heat or impact)."],"lifecycle":{"status":"emerging","label":"Emerging","rationale":"There is some shared sense memory, but not enough clarified usage to say the concept has stabilized.","next_step":"Accumulate a few more claim-level clarifications before treating the current senses as durable.","clarified_share":0.0,"dominant_share":0.8,"dominant_sense":"A holistic state of suffering or unpleasantness that is by definition undesirable.","merge_candidates":[]}},{"term":"self-defence","contestedness_type":"criterion","diagnosis":"Both texts thematise this term explicitly, and each supplies a definitional claim that contradicts the other's. The definitional layer is where the debate actually lives.","usage_count":7,"sense_count":2,"clarification_count":0,"top_senses":["A narrow legal doctrine available to a state against another state's territory, distinct from the ordinary-language notion of defence and unavailable to an occupying power within territory it controls","A free-standing primary rule of international law permitting force, triggered by the factual occurrence of an armed attack and exercisable against whoever authored it"],"lifecycle":{"status":"bifurcated","label":"Bifurcated","rationale":"Two live senses are carrying substantial usage, so the disagreement likely needs explicit split handling rather than premature convergence.","next_step":"Keep the senses distinct and make downstream reasoning depend visibly on which sense is meant.","clarified_share":0.0,"dominant_share":0.571,"dominant_sense":"A narrow legal doctrine available to a state against another state's territory, distinct from the ordinary-language notion of defence and unavailable to an occupying power within territory it controls","merge_candidates":[]}},{"term":"armed attack","contestedness_type":"criterion","diagnosis":"The criterion carries both a State-author requirement and an origin requirement. The opposing text rejects the first by name and never engages the second.","usage_count":6,"sense_count":2,"clarification_count":0,"top_senses":["A factual occurrence characterised by scale and effects, with no requirement as to the author's legal status","An event presupposing a State author and an external origin, whose occurrence in the case of an occupation was completed at the moment of conquest"],"lifecycle":{"status":"bifurcated","label":"Bifurcated","rationale":"Two live senses are carrying substantial usage, so the disagreement likely needs explicit split handling rather than premature convergence.","next_step":"Keep the senses distinct and make downstream reasoning depend visibly on which sense is meant.","clarified_share":0.0,"dominant_share":0.5,"dominant_sense":"A factual occurrence characterised by scale and effects, with no requirement as to the author's legal status","merge_candidates":[]}},{"term":"primary rule / secondary rule","contestedness_type":"semantic","diagnosis":"The distinction does the load-bearing work in the ARSIWA section: it is what lets an incidental sovereignty breach be excused rather than justified.","usage_count":4,"sense_count":1,"clarification_count":0,"top_senses":["A primary rule confers the permission itself; a secondary rule governs the consequences of breach and cannot define the primary rule's scope"],"lifecycle":{"status":"emerging","label":"Emerging","rationale":"There is some shared sense memory, but not enough clarified usage to say the concept has stabilized.","next_step":"Accumulate a few more claim-level clarifications before treating the current senses as durable.","clarified_share":0.0,"dominant_share":1.0,"dominant_sense":"A primary rule confers the permission itself; a secondary rule governs the consequences of breach and cannot define the primary rule's scope","merge_candidates":[]}},{"term":"sovereignty","contestedness_type":"criterion","diagnosis":"Sovereignty appears as a breachable-and-excusable rule rather than as effective control; the opposing text uses the second sense.","usage_count":2,"sense_count":1,"clarification_count":0,"top_senses":["A rule of international law whose incidental breach can be excused by a circumstance precluding wrongfulness"],"lifecycle":{"status":"emerging","label":"Emerging","rationale":"There is some shared sense memory, but not enough clarified usage to say the concept has stabilized.","next_step":"Accumulate a few more claim-level clarifications before treating the current senses as durable.","clarified_share":0.0,"dominant_share":1.0,"dominant_sense":"A rule of international law whose incidental breach can be excused by a circumstance precluding wrongfulness","merge_candidates":[]}},{"term":"occupation","contestedness_type":"criterion","diagnosis":"Contested by omission: the term is load-bearing here and does not appear once in the opposing text. A concept can be contested by one party's silence, which the contested-concept pass would see only on one side.","usage_count":4,"sense_count":1,"clarification_count":0,"top_senses":["A continuing legal status established by effective control, entailing duties toward the occupied population and disabling recourse to Article 51"],"lifecycle":{"status":"emerging","label":"Emerging","rationale":"There is some shared sense memory, but not enough clarified usage to say the concept has stabilized.","next_step":"Accumulate a few more claim-level clarifications before treating the current senses as durable.","clarified_share":0.0,"dominant_share":1.0,"dominant_sense":"A continuing legal status established by effective control, entailing duties toward the occupied population and disabling recourse to Article 51","merge_candidates":[]}},{"term":"defence","contestedness_type":"semantic","diagnosis":"The text draws the distinction explicitly, and it is the mechanism by which a protective entitlement is conceded while a legal characterisation is denied.","usage_count":3,"sense_count":2,"clarification_count":0,"top_senses":["The legal doctrine of self-defence under Article 51, which an occupant may not invoke","Ordinary-language protective action, which a state may take"],"lifecycle":{"status":"bifurcated","label":"Bifurcated","rationale":"Two live senses are carrying substantial usage, so the disagreement likely needs explicit split handling rather than premature convergence.","next_step":"Keep the senses distinct and make downstream reasoning depend visibly on which sense is meant.","clarified_share":0.0,"dominant_share":0.667,"dominant_sense":"The legal doctrine of self-defence under Article 51, which an occupant may not invoke","merge_candidates":[]}},{"term":"sovereignty / effective control","contestedness_type":"criterion","diagnosis":"Where the opposing text treats sovereignty as a breachable rule that self-defence can excuse, this one treats control as a status-generating fact.","usage_count":2,"sense_count":1,"clarification_count":0,"top_senses":["Effective control is the operative fact determining an occupant's legal position, regardless of declared disengagement"],"lifecycle":{"status":"emerging","label":"Emerging","rationale":"There is some shared sense memory, but not enough clarified usage to say the concept has stabilized.","next_step":"Accumulate a few more claim-level clarifications before treating the current senses as durable.","clarified_share":0.0,"dominant_share":1.0,"dominant_sense":"Effective control is the operative fact determining an occupant's legal position, regardless of declared disengagement","merge_candidates":[]}},{"term":"terrorism","contestedness_type":"criterion","diagnosis":"The classification does argumentative work: it converts acts into armed attacks and thereby into Article 51 triggers.","usage_count":2,"sense_count":1,"clarification_count":0,"top_senses":["A category Israel applies to all Palestinian violence including attacks on military targets, in order to trigger the 9/11-era resolutions"],"lifecycle":{"status":"emerging","label":"Emerging","rationale":"There is some shared sense memory, but not enough clarified usage to say the concept has stabilized.","next_step":"Accumulate a few more claim-level clarifications before treating the current senses as durable.","clarified_share":0.0,"dominant_share":1.0,"dominant_sense":"A category Israel applies to all Palestinian violence including attacks on military targets, in order to trigger the 9/11-era resolutions","merge_candidates":[]}}]