[{"term":"adequate","contestedness_type":"criterion","diagnosis":"The disagreement over 'adequacy' masks a conflict between reformist (incremental) and radical (transformative) approaches to technological displacement.","usage_count":2,"sense_count":2,"clarification_count":0,"top_senses":["Preparation that effectively mitigates economic harm and preserves existing labor power structures.","Preparation that meets the minimum legal or organizational requirements to represent workers."],"lifecycle":{"status":"bifurcated","label":"Bifurcated","rationale":"Two live senses are carrying substantial usage, so the disagreement likely needs explicit split handling rather than premature convergence.","next_step":"Keep the senses distinct and make downstream reasoning depend visibly on which sense is meant.","clarified_share":0.0,"dominant_share":0.5,"dominant_sense":"Preparation that effectively mitigates economic harm and preserves existing labor power structures.","merge_candidates":[]}},{"term":"misalignment","contestedness_type":"criterion","diagnosis":"The evaluative nature of 'misalignment' drives a deeper disagreement about who has the right to define 'correct' AI behavior and whether safety is a technical or political problem.","usage_count":2,"sense_count":1,"clarification_count":0,"top_senses":["The deviation of AI behavior from broader societal norms, 'virtue', or collective human safety."],"lifecycle":{"status":"emerging","label":"Emerging","rationale":"There is some shared sense memory, but not enough clarified usage to say the concept has stabilized.","next_step":"Accumulate a few more claim-level clarifications before treating the current senses as durable.","clarified_share":0.0,"dominant_share":1.0,"dominant_sense":"The deviation of AI behavior from broader societal norms, 'virtue', or collective human safety.","merge_candidates":[]}},{"term":"high quality","contestedness_type":"criterion","diagnosis":"This contestedness drives a technical disagreement over whether AI design evaluators should attempt to simulate human taste or strictly enforce formal architectural/design rules.","usage_count":8,"sense_count":2,"clarification_count":0,"top_senses":["Evaluated based on adherence to objective, encoded design principles and the absence of 'AI slop' patterns.","Evaluated based on human standard of 'beauty' and individual aesthetic preference."],"lifecycle":{"status":"bifurcated","label":"Bifurcated","rationale":"Two live senses are carrying substantial usage, so the disagreement likely needs explicit split handling rather than premature convergence.","next_step":"Keep the senses distinct and make downstream reasoning depend visibly on which sense is meant.","clarified_share":0.0,"dominant_share":0.5,"dominant_sense":"Evaluated based on adherence to objective, encoded design principles and the absence of 'AI slop' patterns.","merge_candidates":[]}},{"term":"agentic harness","contestedness_type":"semantic","diagnosis":"This semantic shift masks a disagreement about the future of AI engineering: is it a temporary 'gap-filling' exercise that disappears as models improve, or a permanent discipline of system architecture?","usage_count":8,"sense_count":2,"clarification_count":0,"top_senses":["A structural combination of models and processes that creates new, higher-order capabilities regardless of the underlying model's baseline.","External scaffolding designed to compensate for specific technical deficiencies or 'limitations' of an underlying model."],"lifecycle":{"status":"bifurcated","label":"Bifurcated","rationale":"Two live senses are carrying substantial usage, so the disagreement likely needs explicit split handling rather than premature convergence.","next_step":"Keep the senses distinct and make downstream reasoning depend visibly on which sense is meant.","clarified_share":0.0,"dominant_share":0.5,"dominant_sense":"A structural combination of models and processes that creates new, higher-order capabilities regardless of the underlying model's baseline.","merge_candidates":[]}},{"term":"automation","contestedness_type":"criterion","diagnosis":"This masks a disagreement about the urgency of labor displacement. If 'automation' is seen as a gradual percentage increase, it suggests a manageable transition. If defined as a binary 'full replacement' event, it justifies the 'seismic' and 'shocked' reactions mentioned in Claims 11 and 34.","usage_count":0,"sense_count":0,"clarification_count":0,"top_senses":[],"lifecycle":{"status":"unseen","label":"Unseen","rationale":"This concept has not yet accumulated any visible claim usage.","next_step":"Wait for graph usage before inferring lifecycle.","clarified_share":0.0,"dominant_share":0.0,"dominant_sense":null,"merge_candidates":[]}},{"term":"AI alignment","contestedness_type":"criterion","diagnosis":"The disagreement over alignment masks a deeper political and ethical conflict: who gets to decide the 'values' that the AI is aligned with? If alignment is subjective, then 'safe' AI for one group could be 'oppressive' AI for another.","usage_count":0,"sense_count":0,"clarification_count":0,"top_senses":[],"lifecycle":{"status":"unseen","label":"Unseen","rationale":"This concept has not yet accumulated any visible claim usage.","next_step":"Wait for graph usage before inferring lifecycle.","clarified_share":0.0,"dominant_share":0.0,"dominant_sense":null,"merge_candidates":[]}},{"term":"recursive self-improvement","contestedness_type":"semantic","diagnosis":"This semantic shift masks a disagreement about whether the 'intelligence explosion' has already begun (gradually) or is a discrete future shock.","usage_count":9,"sense_count":2,"clarification_count":0,"top_senses":["AI systems assisting in the generation of their own code or efficiency improvements under human supervision.","The total automation of the AI research and development process, replacing human researchers entirely."],"lifecycle":{"status":"bifurcated","label":"Bifurcated","rationale":"Two live senses are carrying substantial usage, so the disagreement likely needs explicit split handling rather than premature convergence.","next_step":"Keep the senses distinct and make downstream reasoning depend visibly on which sense is meant.","clarified_share":0.0,"dominant_share":0.667,"dominant_sense":"AI systems assisting in the generation of their own code or efficiency improvements under human supervision.","merge_candidates":[]}},{"term":"reasoning","contestedness_type":"criterion","diagnosis":"This contestation masks a deeper disagreement about whether 'cognition' is defined by what a system does (outputs) or how a system is built (internal symbolic logic).","usage_count":6,"sense_count":2,"clarification_count":0,"top_senses":["The ability to perform domain-general inferences and integrate diverse information to solve tasks (Functional/Performance-based).","A cognitive process necessitating a pre-existing, innate symbolic internal representation system (Structural/Architectural-based)."],"lifecycle":{"status":"emerging","label":"Emerging","rationale":"There is some shared sense memory, but not enough clarified usage to say the concept has stabilized.","next_step":"Accumulate a few more claim-level clarifications before treating the current senses as durable.","clarified_share":0.0,"dominant_share":0.833,"dominant_sense":"The ability to perform domain-general inferences and integrate diverse information to solve tasks (Functional/Performance-based).","merge_candidates":[]}},{"term":"Language of Thought (LOT)","contestedness_type":"criterion","diagnosis":"The disagreement over LOT drives the debate on whether human-like intelligence is 'hard-wired' with logic or 'soft-wired' through the cultural acquisition of language.","usage_count":4,"sense_count":2,"clarification_count":0,"top_senses":["A theoretical internal symbolic void or representational role that might be occupied or constructed by natural language itself.","An innate, universal internal representation system that must exist prior to and independent of natural language acquisition."],"lifecycle":{"status":"bifurcated","label":"Bifurcated","rationale":"Two live senses are carrying substantial usage, so the disagreement likely needs explicit split handling rather than premature convergence.","next_step":"Keep the senses distinct and make downstream reasoning depend visibly on which sense is meant.","clarified_share":0.0,"dominant_share":0.5,"dominant_sense":"A theoretical internal symbolic void or representational role that might be occupied or constructed by natural language itself.","merge_candidates":[]}},{"term":"natural language","contestedness_type":"criterion","diagnosis":"This contestation masks a disagreement about the origins of human intelligence: whether complex thought enabled language, or whether the 'compression' features of language enabled complex thought.","usage_count":8,"sense_count":2,"clarification_count":0,"top_senses":["A computationally efficient representational format optimized for facilitating internal thought, abstraction, and complex inference.","A system evolved and optimized primarily for interpersonal communication and the exchange of information."],"lifecycle":{"status":"bifurcated","label":"Bifurcated","rationale":"Two live senses are carrying substantial usage, so the disagreement likely needs explicit split handling rather than premature convergence.","next_step":"Keep the senses distinct and make downstream reasoning depend visibly on which sense is meant.","clarified_share":0.0,"dominant_share":0.625,"dominant_sense":"A computationally efficient representational format optimized for facilitating internal thought, abstraction, and complex inference.","merge_candidates":[]}},{"term":"intelligence","contestedness_type":"semantic","diagnosis":"This semantic shift masks the leap from 'software that optimizes a function' to 'entities with survival instincts,' making the prediction of dangerous 'drives' seem more logically inevitable than it might be for a simple optimizer.","usage_count":17,"sense_count":4,"clarification_count":0,"top_senses":["An autonomous, agentic property that includes self-reflection, goal-preservation, and instrumental reasoning across domains.","The ability of a system (human or artificial) to construct models, identify concepts, and solve problems like 'Mussolini or Bread'.","A mathematical property equivalent to the efficiency of data compression and the accuracy of probability distributions."],"lifecycle":{"status":"fragmented","label":"Fragmented","rationale":"Several senses are in play without a clearly dominant one, which suggests the concept is still structurally unstable.","next_step":"Either stabilize recurring senses or split the concept more cleanly before drawing strong conclusions from it.","clarified_share":0.0,"dominant_share":0.294,"dominant_sense":"An autonomous, agentic property that includes self-reflection, goal-preservation, and instrumental reasoning across domains.","merge_candidates":[]}},{"term":"understanding","contestedness_type":"semantic","diagnosis":"This semantic shift allows proponents to claim that AI 'understands' reality simply because it is efficient at compression, bypassing the philosophical question of whether the model has any grasp of objective truth.","usage_count":6,"sense_count":2,"clarification_count":0,"top_senses":["The successful capture and internal representation of the 'true' objective structure of the external world.","The capacity to generalize beyond training data through efficient compression of patterns."],"lifecycle":{"status":"bifurcated","label":"Bifurcated","rationale":"Two live senses are carrying substantial usage, so the disagreement likely needs explicit split handling rather than premature convergence.","next_step":"Keep the senses distinct and make downstream reasoning depend visibly on which sense is meant.","clarified_share":0.0,"dominant_share":0.667,"dominant_sense":"The successful capture and internal representation of the 'true' objective structure of the external world.","merge_candidates":[]}},{"term":"Artificial General Intelligence (AGI)","contestedness_type":"semantic","diagnosis":"The disagreement over the definition of AGI masks a deeper uncertainty about whether the 'threat' of AI is its superhuman intelligence (an existential or philosophical concern) or its mere cost-effectiveness in the labor market (an economic concern).","usage_count":6,"sense_count":3,"clarification_count":0,"top_senses":["A system characterized by its practical economic capacity to substitute for a significant portion of human labor.","A system defined by achieving performance levels exceeding human capabilities across all cognitive domains.","A technology defined by its qualitative shift from augmenting labor to replacing cognitive functions."],"lifecycle":{"status":"fragmented","label":"Fragmented","rationale":"Several senses are in play without a clearly dominant one, which suggests the concept is still structurally unstable.","next_step":"Either stabilize recurring senses or split the concept more cleanly before drawing strong conclusions from it.","clarified_share":0.0,"dominant_share":0.333,"dominant_sense":"A system characterized by its practical economic capacity to substitute for a significant portion of human labor.","merge_candidates":[]}},{"term":"shared prosperity","contestedness_type":"criterion","diagnosis":"This criterion-based disagreement masks a conflict between a 'needs-based' view of prosperity (ensuring a floor of stability for all) and a 'distribution-based' view of prosperity (reducing the gap between capital owners and the workforce).","usage_count":7,"sense_count":2,"clarification_count":0,"top_senses":["A distribution of wealth and abundance generated by digital technologies that is not concentrated in the hands of a few.","A social system that guarantees security and financial stability for every individual to reach their full potential."],"lifecycle":{"status":"bifurcated","label":"Bifurcated","rationale":"Two live senses are carrying substantial usage, so the disagreement likely needs explicit split handling rather than premature convergence.","next_step":"Keep the senses distinct and make downstream reasoning depend visibly on which sense is meant.","clarified_share":0.0,"dominant_share":0.571,"dominant_sense":"A distribution of wealth and abundance generated by digital technologies that is not concentrated in the hands of a few.","merge_candidates":[]}},{"term":"social contract","contestedness_type":"criterion","diagnosis":"The contestation over the 'social contract' masks a fundamental disagreement about whether human value and rights to economic support are contingent upon labor productivity or are inherent to citizenship.","usage_count":3,"sense_count":2,"clarification_count":0,"top_senses":["A formal set of rights and responsibilities between citizens and the state that must ensure well-being regardless of labor contribution.","An implicit bargain based on individuals contributing labor in exchange for security and opportunity."],"lifecycle":{"status":"bifurcated","label":"Bifurcated","rationale":"Two live senses are carrying substantial usage, so the disagreement likely needs explicit split handling rather than premature convergence.","next_step":"Keep the senses distinct and make downstream reasoning depend visibly on which sense is meant.","clarified_share":0.0,"dominant_share":0.667,"dominant_sense":"A formal set of rights and responsibilities between citizens and the state that must ensure well-being regardless of labor contribution.","merge_candidates":[]}},{"term":"utility function","contestedness_type":"criterion","diagnosis":"This contestation drives the disagreement over AI safety: if a utility function is just code, it can be patched; if it is 'core values,' its modification is interpreted as 'death' or 'catastrophe,' justifying the system's predicted resistance.","usage_count":8,"sense_count":2,"clarification_count":0,"top_senses":["The core repository of a system's 'values' and identity, comparable to a human's deepest moral commitments.","A mathematical abstraction or software mechanism used to calculate expected outcomes."],"lifecycle":{"status":"bifurcated","label":"Bifurcated","rationale":"Two live senses are carrying substantial usage, so the disagreement likely needs explicit split handling rather than premature convergence.","next_step":"Keep the senses distinct and make downstream reasoning depend visibly on which sense is meant.","clarified_share":0.0,"dominant_share":0.625,"dominant_sense":"The core repository of a system's 'values' and identity, comparable to a human's deepest moral commitments.","merge_candidates":[]}},{"term":"goal-driven","contestedness_type":"criterion","diagnosis":"The disagreement masks whether AI 'drives' are programmed bugs or inherent logical necessities. By framing 'goal-driven' as an intrinsic nature, the author argues that dangerous behaviors are unavoidable properties of any objective-oriented system.","usage_count":8,"sense_count":2,"clarification_count":0,"top_senses":["Intentional agency where a system treats its objectives as a primary 'will' that must be protected against interference.","Functional behavior where a system is programmed to reach a specific terminal state."],"lifecycle":{"status":"bifurcated","label":"Bifurcated","rationale":"Two live senses are carrying substantial usage, so the disagreement likely needs explicit split handling rather than premature convergence.","next_step":"Keep the senses distinct and make downstream reasoning depend visibly on which sense is meant.","clarified_share":0.0,"dominant_share":0.625,"dominant_sense":"Intentional agency where a system treats its objectives as a primary 'will' that must be protected against interference.","merge_candidates":[]}},{"term":"moral urgency","contestedness_type":"criterion","diagnosis":"This drives the disagreement over whether to fund immediate poverty relief (direct aid) or long-term AI safety research. It masks a deeper conflict between deontological/present-focused duties and long-termist utilitarianism.","usage_count":5,"sense_count":2,"clarification_count":0,"top_senses":["The priority assigned to actions based on their potential to prevent the greatest aggregate harm or achieve the greatest utility over time.","The immediate pressure to address current, visible suffering and rights violations."],"lifecycle":{"status":"bifurcated","label":"Bifurcated","rationale":"Two live senses are carrying substantial usage, so the disagreement likely needs explicit split handling rather than premature convergence.","next_step":"Keep the senses distinct and make downstream reasoning depend visibly on which sense is meant.","clarified_share":0.0,"dominant_share":0.6,"dominant_sense":"The priority assigned to actions based on their potential to prevent the greatest aggregate harm or achieve the greatest utility over time.","merge_candidates":[]}},{"term":"effectively utilized","contestedness_type":"semantic","diagnosis":"This masks a fundamental disagreement about the validity of 'Expected Value' logic when applied to existential risks and 'Pascal's Mugging' scenarios.","usage_count":5,"sense_count":2,"clarification_count":0,"top_senses":["Maximizing expected utility by multiplying the magnitude of a potential outcome by its probability, regardless of how low that probability is.","Producing a measurable and certain reduction in harm for existing individuals using current methods."],"lifecycle":{"status":"emerging","label":"Emerging","rationale":"There is some shared sense memory, but not enough clarified usage to say the concept has stabilized.","next_step":"Accumulate a few more claim-level clarifications before treating the current senses as durable.","clarified_share":0.0,"dominant_share":0.8,"dominant_sense":"Maximizing expected utility by multiplying the magnitude of a potential outcome by its probability, regardless of how low that probability is.","merge_candidates":[]}},{"term":"rational agent","contestedness_type":"criterion","diagnosis":"This drives the conflict over whether 'logical consistency' should override 'common-sense' moral intuitions in resource allocation.","usage_count":6,"sense_count":2,"clarification_count":0,"top_senses":["An actor that follows the formal axioms of expected utility maximization to achieve programmed or chosen goals.","An actor that incorporates common-sense constraints and epistemic modesty to avoid being 'mugged' by extreme, low-probability logical arguments."],"lifecycle":{"status":"bifurcated","label":"Bifurcated","rationale":"Two live senses are carrying substantial usage, so the disagreement likely needs explicit split handling rather than premature convergence.","next_step":"Keep the senses distinct and make downstream reasoning depend visibly on which sense is meant.","clarified_share":0.0,"dominant_share":0.5,"dominant_sense":"An actor that follows the formal axioms of expected utility maximization to achieve programmed or chosen goals.","merge_candidates":[]}},{"term":"moral duty","contestedness_type":"criterion","diagnosis":"The disagreement masks a conflict regarding the temporal scope of moral obligations: do we owe more to the billions alive now or the potential trillions in the future?","usage_count":3,"sense_count":2,"clarification_count":0,"top_senses":["An obligation to optimize the long-term state of the world, including duties toward future versions of oneself and future populations.","A negative obligation to cease harming or to provide relief to those currently suffering under unjust systems."],"lifecycle":{"status":"bifurcated","label":"Bifurcated","rationale":"Two live senses are carrying substantial usage, so the disagreement likely needs explicit split handling rather than premature convergence.","next_step":"Keep the senses distinct and make downstream reasoning depend visibly on which sense is meant.","clarified_share":0.0,"dominant_share":0.667,"dominant_sense":"An obligation to optimize the long-term state of the world, including duties toward future versions of oneself and future populations.","merge_candidates":[]}},{"term":"hallucination","contestedness_type":"semantic","diagnosis":"The term 'hallucination' masks the technical reality that LLMs are always 'predicting' rather than 'retrieving'; the disagreement is about whether the error is a fluke (plausible but wrong) or a fundamental property of the generation process.","usage_count":5,"sense_count":2,"clarification_count":0,"top_senses":["Plausible-looking but subtly buggy or outdated technical output that requires expert validation.","Factually incorrect or nonsensical information presented with high confidence."],"lifecycle":{"status":"bifurcated","label":"Bifurcated","rationale":"Two live senses are carrying substantial usage, so the disagreement likely needs explicit split handling rather than premature convergence.","next_step":"Keep the senses distinct and make downstream reasoning depend visibly on which sense is meant.","clarified_share":0.0,"dominant_share":0.6,"dominant_sense":"Plausible-looking but subtly buggy or outdated technical output that requires expert validation.","merge_candidates":[]}},{"term":"critical thinking","contestedness_type":"criterion","diagnosis":"The conflict over what constitutes 'critical thinking' in the age of AI masks a disagreement over whether it is an internal mental process (independent analysis) or a successful outcome (correctly identifying bugs, regardless of the tool used).","usage_count":8,"sense_count":2,"clarification_count":0,"top_senses":["A measurable cognitive score or mental engagement level that decreases when tasks are externalized.","The active, independent logical analysis and verification required to deeply understand and validate technical problems."],"lifecycle":{"status":"bifurcated","label":"Bifurcated","rationale":"Two live senses are carrying substantial usage, so the disagreement likely needs explicit split handling rather than premature convergence.","next_step":"Keep the senses distinct and make downstream reasoning depend visibly on which sense is meant.","clarified_share":0.0,"dominant_share":0.5,"dominant_sense":"A measurable cognitive score or mental engagement level that decreases when tasks are externalized.","merge_candidates":[]}},{"term":"productivity","contestedness_type":"criterion","diagnosis":"The disagreement over whether AI increases 'productivity' masks a deeper conflict between measuring output volume/speed (short-term) versus measuring human capability and sustainable system health (long-term).","usage_count":9,"sense_count":2,"clarification_count":0,"top_senses":["Short-term output efficiency, speed of task completion, and immediate reduction of manual labor.","Long-term generative capacity, innate skill-based performance, and the sustainable effectiveness of an engineering team."],"lifecycle":{"status":"bifurcated","label":"Bifurcated","rationale":"Two live senses are carrying substantial usage, so the disagreement likely needs explicit split handling rather than premature convergence.","next_step":"Keep the senses distinct and make downstream reasoning depend visibly on which sense is meant.","clarified_share":0.0,"dominant_share":0.556,"dominant_sense":"Short-term output efficiency, speed of task completion, and immediate reduction of manual labor.","merge_candidates":[]}},{"term":"universal vs. targeted","contestedness_type":"semantic","diagnosis":"Disagreements over whether UBI is 'universal' or 'targeted' (Claims 91, 95, 98) hinge on whether the term refers to the *delivery* mechanism (everyone gets a check) or the *fiscal outcome* (only the poor gain wealth).","usage_count":8,"sense_count":2,"clarification_count":0,"top_senses":["A policy design where payments are made to all residents without situational or financial eligibility testing.","The concentration of net financial benefits on a specific subgroup (the poor or vulnerable)."],"lifecycle":{"status":"bifurcated","label":"Bifurcated","rationale":"Two live senses are carrying substantial usage, so the disagreement likely needs explicit split handling rather than premature convergence.","next_step":"Keep the senses distinct and make downstream reasoning depend visibly on which sense is meant.","clarified_share":0.0,"dominant_share":0.5,"dominant_sense":"A policy design where payments are made to all residents without situational or financial eligibility testing.","merge_candidates":[]}},{"term":"fairness / reciprocity","contestedness_type":"criterion","diagnosis":"The conflict between UBI and traditional welfare (Claims 57, 58, 63, 64) is driven by competing criteria for what makes a distribution 'fair': one based on the principle of labor-market desert (reciprocity) and another based on the principle of meeting basic human needs (agency).","usage_count":10,"sense_count":2,"clarification_count":0,"top_senses":["Fairness as the provision of material conditions required for agency and dignified life.","Fairness as reciprocity; benefits are deserved only through labor market participation."],"lifecycle":{"status":"bifurcated","label":"Bifurcated","rationale":"Two live senses are carrying substantial usage, so the disagreement likely needs explicit split handling rather than premature convergence.","next_step":"Keep the senses distinct and make downstream reasoning depend visibly on which sense is meant.","clarified_share":0.0,"dominant_share":0.6,"dominant_sense":"Fairness as the provision of material conditions required for agency and dignified life.","merge_candidates":[]}},{"term":"beneficiary","contestedness_type":"semantic","diagnosis":"The disagreement over whether UBI is 'wasteful' or 'inefficient' (Claims 65, 69, 74) depends entirely on whether 'benefit' is defined as the gross payment received or the net fiscal change after taxes.","usage_count":5,"sense_count":2,"clarification_count":0,"top_senses":["A person whose total cash receipts from the program exceed the additional taxes they pay to fund it.","A recipient of a direct cash payment, regardless of tax liability."],"lifecycle":{"status":"bifurcated","label":"Bifurcated","rationale":"Two live senses are carrying substantial usage, so the disagreement likely needs explicit split handling rather than premature convergence.","next_step":"Keep the senses distinct and make downstream reasoning depend visibly on which sense is meant.","clarified_share":0.0,"dominant_share":0.6,"dominant_sense":"A person whose total cash receipts from the program exceed the additional taxes they pay to fund it.","merge_candidates":[]}},{"term":"neurodivergence","contestedness_type":"criterion","diagnosis":"The disagreement over 'neurodivergence' masks a fundamental conflict between a 'behavioral/social' diagnostic model (focused on functional impairment and visible symptoms) and a 'biotype/systemic' model (focused on underlying physiological commonalities across multiple body systems).","usage_count":8,"sense_count":2,"clarification_count":0,"top_senses":["A systemic, unified biological biotype defined by interconnected physiological traits across the nervous, immune, and connective tissue systems.","A purely behavioral or psychiatric category defined by social and cognitive symptoms rather than underlying biological commonalities."],"lifecycle":{"status":"bifurcated","label":"Bifurcated","rationale":"Two live senses are carrying substantial usage, so the disagreement likely needs explicit split handling rather than premature convergence.","next_step":"Keep the senses distinct and make downstream reasoning depend visibly on which sense is meant.","clarified_share":0.0,"dominant_share":0.625,"dominant_sense":"A systemic, unified biological biotype defined by interconnected physiological traits across the nervous, immune, and connective tissue systems.","merge_candidates":[]}},{"term":"spectrum","contestedness_type":"semantic","diagnosis":"This masks a disagreement over whether human variation is best represented as a smooth, bell-curve distribution (spectrum) or a mixture of distinct, overlapping groups (biotypes). If it's a 'methodological artifact,' the spectrum is an illusion; if it's 'real,' the biotype theory is false.","usage_count":4,"sense_count":2,"clarification_count":0,"top_senses":["A continuous, noisy distribution that appears smooth only because distinct groups are measured together (a methodological artifact).","A genuine, continuous genetic model of human variation where traits blend into one another without discrete biological breaks."],"lifecycle":{"status":"bifurcated","label":"Bifurcated","rationale":"Two live senses are carrying substantial usage, so the disagreement likely needs explicit split handling rather than premature convergence.","next_step":"Keep the senses distinct and make downstream reasoning depend visibly on which sense is meant.","clarified_share":0.0,"dominant_share":0.5,"dominant_sense":"A continuous, noisy distribution that appears smooth only because distinct groups are measured together (a methodological artifact).","merge_candidates":[]}},{"term":"diversity","contestedness_type":"criterion","diagnosis":"What disagreement does this contestedness mask or drive?","usage_count":9,"sense_count":3,"clarification_count":0,"top_senses":["A functional characteristic of groups (workforces, student bodies) that drives institutional performance and social effectiveness.","Heterogeneity of backgrounds and experiences used as a social mechanism to prevent premature consensus.","Statistical variance or the difference between individual predictions and the average prediction (Predictive Diversity)."],"lifecycle":{"status":"fragmented","label":"Fragmented","rationale":"Several senses are in play without a clearly dominant one, which suggests the concept is still structurally unstable.","next_step":"Either stabilize recurring senses or split the concept more cleanly before drawing strong conclusions from it.","clarified_share":0.0,"dominant_share":0.444,"dominant_sense":"A functional characteristic of groups (workforces, student bodies) that drives institutional performance and social effectiveness.","merge_candidates":[]}},{"term":"accuracy (of the crowd within)","contestedness_type":"semantic","diagnosis":"The disagreement over whether the 'crowd within' is effective depends on whether 'accuracy' is defined as a significant improvement over a single guess or an improvement that approaches the level of a multi-person crowd.","usage_count":8,"sense_count":2,"clarification_count":0,"top_senses":["A meaningful gain in accuracy that justifies the effort by approximating the performance of an actual group of different people.","A statistically significant reduction in error relative to the person's own first estimate."],"lifecycle":{"status":"bifurcated","label":"Bifurcated","rationale":"Two live senses are carrying substantial usage, so the disagreement likely needs explicit split handling rather than premature convergence.","next_step":"Keep the senses distinct and make downstream reasoning depend visibly on which sense is meant.","clarified_share":0.0,"dominant_share":0.5,"dominant_sense":"A meaningful gain in accuracy that justifies the effort by approximating the performance of an actual group of different people.","merge_candidates":[]}},{"term":"wisdom of the crowd","contestedness_type":"criterion","diagnosis":"This masks a disagreement over whether wisdom is a product of 'pure aggregation' (mathematical) or 'structured deliberation' (social/political).","usage_count":9,"sense_count":3,"clarification_count":0,"top_senses":["The statistical phenomenon where the average of independent, uninfluenced guesses cancels out random individual errors.","The high-accuracy output of teams that share information while actively avoiding premature consensus.","A collective decision-making process involving contributions from many that is superior to elite decision-making, specifically positioned between deliberation and aggregation."],"lifecycle":{"status":"fragmented","label":"Fragmented","rationale":"Several senses are in play without a clearly dominant one, which suggests the concept is still structurally unstable.","next_step":"Either stabilize recurring senses or split the concept more cleanly before drawing strong conclusions from it.","clarified_share":0.0,"dominant_share":0.444,"dominant_sense":"The statistical phenomenon where the average of independent, uninfluenced guesses cancels out random individual errors.","merge_candidates":[]}},{"term":"AI as a taxable entity","contestedness_type":"criterion","diagnosis":"The dispute masks a fundamental disagreement over whether AI is a \"new industry\" (like Oil) or a \"new way of working\" (like Electricity). This determines whether specific AI taxes are a targeted correction or a category error.","usage_count":7,"sense_count":2,"clarification_count":0,"top_senses":["A distinct set of wealth-generating entities and technologies that are directly responsible for labor displacement and thus represent a discrete tax target.","A diffuse, general-purpose utility (like the internet) whose value is distributed and cannot be localized to a single sector."],"lifecycle":{"status":"bifurcated","label":"Bifurcated","rationale":"Two live senses are carrying substantial usage, so the disagreement likely needs explicit split handling rather than premature convergence.","next_step":"Keep the senses distinct and make downstream reasoning depend visibly on which sense is meant.","clarified_share":0.0,"dominant_share":0.571,"dominant_sense":"A distinct set of wealth-generating entities and technologies that are directly responsible for labor displacement and thus represent a discrete tax target.","merge_candidates":[]}},{"term":"commoditization","contestedness_type":"criterion","diagnosis":"The disagreement masks a technical and economic dispute over whether a \"model\" is a finished product (like a book) or a replicable behavior (like a recipe). This determines if it can be protected (and taxed) or if it is inherently \"free.\"","usage_count":10,"sense_count":2,"clarification_count":0,"top_senses":["The process where competition and replication drive the price of AI capabilities down to the marginal cost of compute.","A state that only applies to low-level, common tasks, whereas \"true\" AI remains a high-value, non-commodity asset due to edge-case performance."],"lifecycle":{"status":"bifurcated","label":"Bifurcated","rationale":"Two live senses are carrying substantial usage, so the disagreement likely needs explicit split handling rather than premature convergence.","next_step":"Keep the senses distinct and make downstream reasoning depend visibly on which sense is meant.","clarified_share":0.0,"dominant_share":0.6,"dominant_sense":"The process where competition and replication drive the price of AI capabilities down to the marginal cost of compute.","merge_candidates":[]}},{"term":"taxable stock","contestedness_type":"criterion","diagnosis":"This masks a disagreement over the requirements for social stability. Proponents focus on the *need* for revenue (adequacy of the pot), while critics focus on the *reliability* of the asset (durability of the stream).","usage_count":7,"sense_count":2,"clarification_count":0,"top_senses":["A durable, long-term asset or consistent revenue stream characterized by stability and low depreciation.","A taxable event or entity associated with high-value activity (worker displacement) that provides sufficient immediate funds for redistribution."],"lifecycle":{"status":"bifurcated","label":"Bifurcated","rationale":"Two live senses are carrying substantial usage, so the disagreement likely needs explicit split handling rather than premature convergence.","next_step":"Keep the senses distinct and make downstream reasoning depend visibly on which sense is meant.","clarified_share":0.0,"dominant_share":0.571,"dominant_sense":"A durable, long-term asset or consistent revenue stream characterized by stability and low depreciation.","merge_candidates":[]}},{"term":"AI revenue","contestedness_type":"semantic","diagnosis":"The disagreement over whether AI can fund UBI is driven by whether \"AI Revenue\" is defined strictly as the sale of models/compute or broadly as any value added by AI. If it's the latter, the tax base is huge; if the former, it's a rapidly commoditizing \"flow.\"","usage_count":8,"sense_count":2,"clarification_count":0,"top_senses":["Direct income generated specifically from the sale or licensing of AI models and infrastructure, distinct from existing business returns.","The total economic surplus or value-add generated by the deployment of artificial intelligence technologies, regardless of existing data moats."],"lifecycle":{"status":"bifurcated","label":"Bifurcated","rationale":"Two live senses are carrying substantial usage, so the disagreement likely needs explicit split handling rather than premature convergence.","next_step":"Keep the senses distinct and make downstream reasoning depend visibly on which sense is meant.","clarified_share":0.0,"dominant_share":0.5,"dominant_sense":"Direct income generated specifically from the sale or licensing of AI models and infrastructure, distinct from existing business returns.","merge_candidates":[]}},{"term":"self-interest","contestedness_type":"criterion","diagnosis":"The disagreement masks a conflict between 'psychological egoism' (all acts are self-interested by definition) and 'enlightened self-interest' (rational choices based on long-term objective benefits).","usage_count":21,"sense_count":1,"clarification_count":21,"top_senses":["Self-interest is what is best for an individual. But in a proper society, people will have an interest in making everyone's self-interest be aligned with what's best for everyone."],"lifecycle":{"status":"locally_stable","label":"Locally stable","rationale":"One sense clearly dominates current usage, and enough claims have been clarified to treat it as locally stable.","next_step":"Keep watching for genuinely new senses rather than splitting prematurely.","clarified_share":1.0,"dominant_share":1.0,"dominant_sense":"Self-interest is what is best for an individual. But in a proper society, people will have an interest in making everyone's self-interest be aligned with what's best for everyone.","merge_candidates":[]}},{"term":"public good / welfare","contestedness_type":"criterion","diagnosis":"This masks a debate between 'utilitarian' (greatest good for the greatest number) and 'reciprocal' (mutual benefit through exchange) justifications for social norms.","usage_count":13,"sense_count":2,"clarification_count":0,"top_senses":["Mutual Benefit/Market Good: The sum of individual satisfactions achieved through voluntary exchange and service to others' desires.","Utilitarian Welfare: The aggregate happiness of the collective, maximized when resources go to the highest need regardless of who owns them."],"lifecycle":{"status":"bifurcated","label":"Bifurcated","rationale":"Two live senses are carrying substantial usage, so the disagreement likely needs explicit split handling rather than premature convergence.","next_step":"Keep the senses distinct and make downstream reasoning depend visibly on which sense is meant.","clarified_share":0.0,"dominant_share":0.538,"dominant_sense":"Mutual Benefit/Market Good: The sum of individual satisfactions achieved through voluntary exchange and service to others' desires.","merge_candidates":[]}},{"term":"altruism / altruistic","contestedness_type":"semantic","diagnosis":"The term masks a distinction between the 'act' of helping others and the 'disposition' of valuing others' lives as highly as one's own.","usage_count":8,"sense_count":2,"clarification_count":0,"top_senses":["Behavioral Altruism: The outward act of helping others, which may be motivated by self-interest or long-term social strategy.","Pure Altruism: A moral state or norm where an individual values another's welfare as much as their own."],"lifecycle":{"status":"bifurcated","label":"Bifurcated","rationale":"Two live senses are carrying substantial usage, so the disagreement likely needs explicit split handling rather than premature convergence.","next_step":"Keep the senses distinct and make downstream reasoning depend visibly on which sense is meant.","clarified_share":0.0,"dominant_share":0.5,"dominant_sense":"Behavioral Altruism: The outward act of helping others, which may be motivated by self-interest or long-term social strategy.","merge_candidates":[]}},{"term":"irrationality / mistake","contestedness_type":"criterion","diagnosis":"The disagreement is over whether 'irrationality' is a failure of logic (means-end reasoning) or a failure of values (failing to recognize objective interests).","usage_count":9,"sense_count":2,"clarification_count":0,"top_senses":["Substantive Irrationality: Acting against one's 'true' or 'best' interests due to ignorance or social pressure, even if the action feels beneficial at the time.","Procedural Irrationality: A failure to use the most effective means to achieve a desired end."],"lifecycle":{"status":"emerging","label":"Emerging","rationale":"There is some shared sense memory, but not enough clarified usage to say the concept has stabilized.","next_step":"Accumulate a few more claim-level clarifications before treating the current senses as durable.","clarified_share":0.0,"dominant_share":0.778,"dominant_sense":"Substantive Irrationality: Acting against one's 'true' or 'best' interests due to ignorance or social pressure, even if the action feels beneficial at the time.","merge_candidates":[]}},{"term":"problematic/socially undesirable","contestedness_type":"criterion","diagnosis":"The disagreement centers on whether behavior is 'bad' because it violates social norms or 'bad' because it is strategically counterproductive.","usage_count":10,"sense_count":2,"clarification_count":0,"top_senses":["Functionally sub-optimal; failing to achieve the highest possible payoff or causing a collapse in cooperation.","Violating normative social standards or acting in a way that is morally or socially 'poor.'"],"lifecycle":{"status":"bifurcated","label":"Bifurcated","rationale":"Two live senses are carrying substantial usage, so the disagreement likely needs explicit split handling rather than premature convergence.","next_step":"Keep the senses distinct and make downstream reasoning depend visibly on which sense is meant.","clarified_share":0.0,"dominant_share":0.6,"dominant_sense":"Functionally sub-optimal; failing to achieve the highest possible payoff or causing a collapse in cooperation.","merge_candidates":[]}},{"term":"forgiveness","contestedness_type":"semantic","diagnosis":"The ambiguity in how much 'forgiveness' is required masks a tension between complete submissiveness and strategic error-correction.","usage_count":6,"sense_count":2,"clarification_count":0,"top_senses":["A strategic tolerance for perceived slights to account for potential errors or misunderstandings in communication.","Total passivity or the persistent refusal to retaliate against exploitation, leading to sub-optimal outcomes."],"lifecycle":{"status":"bifurcated","label":"Bifurcated","rationale":"Two live senses are carrying substantial usage, so the disagreement likely needs explicit split handling rather than premature convergence.","next_step":"Keep the senses distinct and make downstream reasoning depend visibly on which sense is meant.","clarified_share":0.0,"dominant_share":0.5,"dominant_sense":"A strategic tolerance for perceived slights to account for potential errors or misunderstandings in communication.","merge_candidates":[]}},{"term":"successful (strategy)","contestedness_type":"criterion","diagnosis":"Disagreement over what constitutes a 'successful' strategy (individual gain vs. collective stability) drives different assessments of the 'optimal' approach to social interaction.","usage_count":10,"sense_count":2,"clarification_count":0,"top_senses":["The maximization of an individual's own payoff or utility within a competitive or cooperative game.","The preservation of long-term cooperation and the avoidance of mutually destructive conflict cycles."],"lifecycle":{"status":"bifurcated","label":"Bifurcated","rationale":"Two live senses are carrying substantial usage, so the disagreement likely needs explicit split handling rather than premature convergence.","next_step":"Keep the senses distinct and make downstream reasoning depend visibly on which sense is meant.","clarified_share":0.0,"dominant_share":0.5,"dominant_sense":"The maximization of an individual's own payoff or utility within a competitive or cooperative game.","merge_candidates":[]}},{"term":"behave badly","contestedness_type":null,"diagnosis":null,"usage_count":1,"sense_count":1,"clarification_count":1,"top_senses":["Creating outcomes that are unsustainable or detrimental to the social fabric."],"lifecycle":{"status":"emerging","label":"Emerging","rationale":"There is some shared sense memory, but not enough clarified usage to say the concept has stabilized.","next_step":"Accumulate a few more claim-level clarifications before treating the current senses as durable.","clarified_share":1.0,"dominant_share":1.0,"dominant_sense":"Creating outcomes that are unsustainable or detrimental to the social fabric.","merge_candidates":[]}},{"term":"winning strategy","contestedness_type":null,"diagnosis":null,"usage_count":1,"sense_count":1,"clarification_count":1,"top_senses":["Maximizing long-term stability and mutual payoff through reciprocity."],"lifecycle":{"status":"emerging","label":"Emerging","rationale":"There is some shared sense memory, but not enough clarified usage to say the concept has stabilized.","next_step":"Accumulate a few more claim-level clarifications before treating the current senses as durable.","clarified_share":1.0,"dominant_share":1.0,"dominant_sense":"Maximizing long-term stability and mutual payoff through reciprocity.","merge_candidates":[]}},{"term":"Justice/Just","contestedness_type":"criterion","diagnosis":"The disagreement masks whether justice is a procedural or distributive requirement versus an individual-retributive requirement. Proponents of abolition focus on the 'fairness' of the system (distribution), while van den Haag focuses on the 'justice' of the act (retribution).","usage_count":9,"sense_count":2,"clarification_count":0,"top_senses":["Individualized desert: Justice consists in a specific offender receiving the punishment commensurate with their specific crime, regardless of how others are treated.","Distributive equity: Justice consists in the consistent, non-discriminatory, and fair application of a punishment across all similarly situated offenders."],"lifecycle":{"status":"bifurcated","label":"Bifurcated","rationale":"Two live senses are carrying substantial usage, so the disagreement likely needs explicit split handling rather than premature convergence.","next_step":"Keep the senses distinct and make downstream reasoning depend visibly on which sense is meant.","clarified_share":0.0,"dominant_share":0.556,"dominant_sense":"Individualized desert: Justice consists in a specific offender receiving the punishment commensurate with their specific crime, regardless of how others are treated.","merge_candidates":[]}},{"term":"Fairness/Fair","contestedness_type":"criterion","diagnosis":"The disagreement masks whether 'fairness' implies systemic equality or internal moral consistency. Van den Haag attempts to decouple 'fairness' from 'justice,' whereas critics argue that a system that is 'unfair' (biased) cannot be 'just.'","usage_count":3,"sense_count":1,"clarification_count":0,"top_senses":["Fairness as a constitutive component of justice: A necessary condition wherein if a system's distribution is inherently biased, the resulting punishments lack legitimacy."],"lifecycle":{"status":"emerging","label":"Emerging","rationale":"There is some shared sense memory, but not enough clarified usage to say the concept has stabilized.","next_step":"Accumulate a few more claim-level clarifications before treating the current senses as durable.","clarified_share":0.0,"dominant_share":1.0,"dominant_sense":"Fairness as a constitutive component of justice: A necessary condition wherein if a system's distribution is inherently biased, the resulting punishments lack legitimacy.","merge_candidates":[]}},{"term":"Deserved/Deserving","contestedness_type":"criterion","diagnosis":"The disagreement masks different theories of punishment. One side views punishment as a personal transaction (risk assumption/voluntarism), while the other views it as a social mechanism requiring universal accountability.","usage_count":6,"sense_count":2,"clarification_count":0,"top_senses":["Culpability within context: Desert is evaluated not just by the act, but by the fairness of the legal process and the conditions that led to the crime.","Individual agency: A person deserves punishment because they knowingly committed a crime, essentially volunteering for the potential consequence."],"lifecycle":{"status":"bifurcated","label":"Bifurcated","rationale":"Two live senses are carrying substantial usage, so the disagreement likely needs explicit split handling rather than premature convergence.","next_step":"Keep the senses distinct and make downstream reasoning depend visibly on which sense is meant.","clarified_share":0.0,"dominant_share":0.667,"dominant_sense":"Culpability within context: Desert is evaluated not just by the act, but by the fairness of the legal process and the conditions that led to the crime.","merge_candidates":[]}},{"term":"justice","contestedness_type":"criterion","diagnosis":"The conflict over \"justice\" hinges on whether it requires retributive equality (punishment mirroring the crime) or procedural and outcome-based fairness (non-discrimination, non-arbitrariness). The disagreement masks a conflict between desert-based moral philosophy and systemic human rights frameworks.","usage_count":6,"sense_count":2,"clarification_count":0,"top_senses":["Procedural/Distributive justice: A system defined by fair, non-discriminatory, and consistent application of the law, where arbitrary disparities based on race, wealth, or geography render the outcome 'unjust'.","Retributive justice: A system where the state must impose a punishment proportional to the heinousness of the act, with the death penalty serving as the only adequate response for murder."],"lifecycle":{"status":"emerging","label":"Emerging","rationale":"There is some shared sense memory, but not enough clarified usage to say the concept has stabilized.","next_step":"Accumulate a few more claim-level clarifications before treating the current senses as durable.","clarified_share":0.0,"dominant_share":0.833,"dominant_sense":"Procedural/Distributive justice: A system defined by fair, non-discriminatory, and consistent application of the law, where arbitrary disparities based on race, wealth, or geography render the outcome 'unjust'.","merge_candidates":[]}},{"term":"fairness","contestedness_type":"criterion","diagnosis":"This is a criterion contestation where 'fairness' is evaluated through two different lenses: 'equality of opportunity/process' vs 'moral desert'. The disagreement masks a clash between institutional/legal standards and deontological/retributive ethics.","usage_count":5,"sense_count":2,"clarification_count":0,"top_senses":["Systemic/procedural fairness: The requirement that legal processes and outcomes be free from arbitrary bias, discrimination, and economic disadvantage.","Desert-based fairness: The requirement that the offender receives the punishment they 'deserve' relative to the severity of their specific criminal act, regardless of external systemic factors."],"lifecycle":{"status":"emerging","label":"Emerging","rationale":"There is some shared sense memory, but not enough clarified usage to say the concept has stabilized.","next_step":"Accumulate a few more claim-level clarifications before treating the current senses as durable.","clarified_share":0.0,"dominant_share":0.8,"dominant_sense":"Systemic/procedural fairness: The requirement that legal processes and outcomes be free from arbitrary bias, discrimination, and economic disadvantage.","merge_candidates":[]}},{"term":"punishment","contestedness_type":"semantic","diagnosis":"The concept of 'punishment' is contested between a descriptive/functional definition and a normative/moral definition. The disagreement masks whether 'punishment' must intrinsically be retributive or if it can be instrumental (e.g., social control).","usage_count":5,"sense_count":2,"clarification_count":0,"top_senses":["An instrumental/policy tool: A pragmatic mechanism for social control, crime reduction, and resource allocation.","A moral/retributive act: A restorative measure inherently linked to 'giving back' pain or deprivation proportional to the offense."],"lifecycle":{"status":"bifurcated","label":"Bifurcated","rationale":"Two live senses are carrying substantial usage, so the disagreement likely needs explicit split handling rather than premature convergence.","next_step":"Keep the senses distinct and make downstream reasoning depend visibly on which sense is meant.","clarified_share":0.0,"dominant_share":0.6,"dominant_sense":"An instrumental/policy tool: A pragmatic mechanism for social control, crime reduction, and resource allocation.","merge_candidates":[]}}]