# Contested concept: resilience

_**What you are reading**: one contested-concept page in Deliberus's deliberation graph. Deliberus maps human reasoning — including claims that are contested, mistaken, or extreme — so that disagreement can be examined precisely. A claim's presence here is not an endorsement: the graph records that someone argued it, how it connects to other reasoning, and how far scrutiny has gotten. The metadata on this page describes the state of that scrutiny, not the truth of the claim._

---

- **Contestedness**: criterion
- **Diagnosis**: Both camps claim to reduce catastrophic risk, but they apply different principles of what makes a system safe. This is why the authors say compromise is impossible: some interventions are resilient on one criterion and brittle on the other.
- **Canonical**: `/concept/resilience` (data: `/concept/resilience.json`)