# Contested concept: justice

_**What you are reading**: one contested-concept page in Deliberus's deliberation graph. Deliberus maps human reasoning — including claims that are contested, mistaken, or extreme — so that disagreement can be examined precisely. A claim's presence here is not an endorsement: the graph records that someone argued it, how it connects to other reasoning, and how far scrutiny has gotten. The metadata on this page describes the state of that scrutiny, not the truth of the claim._

---

- **Contestedness**: criterion
- **Diagnosis**: The conflict over "justice" hinges on whether it requires retributive equality (punishment mirroring the crime) or procedural and outcome-based fairness (non-discrimination, non-arbitrariness). The disagreement masks a conflict between desert-based moral philosophy and systemic human rights frameworks.
- **Canonical**: `/concept/justice` (data: `/concept/justice.json`)