# Claim: The correlation between Large Language Models wrapping up…

_**What you are reading**: one claim-node in Deliberus's deliberation graph. Deliberus maps human reasoning — including claims that are contested, mistaken, or extreme — so that disagreement can be examined precisely. A claim's presence here is not an endorsement: the graph records that someone argued it, how it connects to other reasoning, and how far scrutiny has gotten. The metadata on this page describes the state of that scrutiny, not the truth of the claim._

---

> The correlation between Large Language Models wrapping up work prematurely as they approach a perceived context limit and the existence of the behavioral pattern known as 'context anxiety' is strong enough to be reliable.

- **Type**: empirical
- **Provenance**: cq_positive
- **Attributed to**: deliberus_system
- **Confidence**: 0.50
- **Source**: [Harness design for long-running application development \ Anthropic](/extraction/harness-design-for-long-running-application-development-anth.md)
- **Canonical**: `/claim/cq_021d368bb357` (this document: `/claim/cq_021d368bb357.md`, data: `/claim/cq_021d368bb357.json`)

## What this claim argues
- this **supports** → [Some Large Language Models exhibit 'context anxiety,' a behavioral pattern where the model's performance shifts as it approaches its contex…](/claim/claim_c321fda70842.md) _(scheme: sign; strength: 0.50)_

## Scrutiny state
- **Age**: entered the graph 2026-03-31
- **Derivational completeness**: `bundled` — exposure 0.00 across 1 reachable claim(s), decomposition depth 0
- **Open sorry-frontier**: 1 claim(s) in this subtree not yet decomposed or supported
- **Horizon reading** (read 2026-10-10, refreshed on every read): `unexamined` — nothing beneath this claim has been tested yet — a kind is read only from a tested arrangement, never assigned; attaching and scoring an attack, a test or a definitional split is what makes one readable
- **No gate**: this reading routes and counts; it permits and forbids nothing, and one new attack changes it. What no reading can see is the move nobody has made yet — contribute it
- **Structure proposed (deterministic, never the reading)**: `empirical` (confidence 0.80) — Empirical leaf: reduces to a resolvable factual question.
- **Full oracle**: `/claims/cq_021d368bb357/completeness` · this reading: `/claims/cq_021d368bb357/horizon` · corpus falsification metric: `/graph/horizon-map`

---
_Deliberus — a structured deliberation graph. The graph has no permanent bottom; every claim is invitable to decompose deeper._